Elevator decelerating down vs accelerating up

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the tension force (FT) in an elevator cable during different scenarios of motion. It questions whether FT is the same when an elevator decelerates downward at -3 m/s² compared to accelerating upward at 3 m/s². The equations provided indicate that the direction of acceleration affects the calculations of FT, with the need for consistent sign conventions. Clarification is offered that, depending on how positive and negative directions are defined, FT can indeed be equal in both scenarios. Understanding the impact of acceleration direction is crucial for conceptualizing the problem accurately.
Ralph777
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This is not an actual problem from my class. All our problems involved an elevator going upward (both accelerating and decelerating). But I am curious if an elevator cable would have the same FT if the elevator was decelerating downward at -3 m/s2 as it would accelerating upward at 3 m/s2 ? I am having a hard time conceptualizing why that is true in my mind's eye.

Homework Equations



Elevator Up: FT - mg = ma
so: FT = m (a + g)

so I figure that:
@ a<0 FT< FG
@ a=0 FT= FG
@ a>0 FT > 0

I was curious what the values are when the elevator is going down.
I used this equation: mg - FT = ma
so: FT = m ( g - a )

so I figure that:
@ a<0 FT> FG
@ a=0 FT= FG
@ a>0 FT< FG

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it true that an elevator cable would have the same FT if the elevator was decelerating downward at -3 m/s2 as it would accelerating upward at 3 m/s2 ? I am having a hard time conceptualizing why that is true in my mind's eye.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ralph777 said:
This is not an actual problem from my class. All our problems involved an elevator going upward (both accelerating and decelerating). But I am curious if an elevator cable would have the same FT if the elevator was decelerating downward at -3 m/s2 as it would accelerating upward at 3 m/s2 ? I am having a hard time conceptualizing why that is true in my mind's eye.

Homework Equations



Elevator Up: FT - mg = ma
so: FT = m (a + g)

so I figure that:
@ a<0 FT< FG
@ a=0 FT= FG
@ a>0 FT > 0

I was curious what the values are when the elevator is going down.
I used this equation: mg - FT = ma
so: FT = m ( g - a )

so I figure that:
@ a<0 FT> FG
@ a=0 FT= FG
@ a>0 FT< FG

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it true that an elevator cable would have the same FT if the elevator was decelerating downward at -3 m/s2 as it would accelerating upward at 3 m/s2 ? I am having a hard time conceptualizing why that is true in my mind's eye.

Thanks
you let the plus and minus sign sting you (it happens quite often)!
In your second set of equations for the downward acceleration, you assumed that the downward direction was positive (g is positive), and therefore, the downward acceleration is positive. Thus, FT is less than the elevator weight in this case, and greater than the elevator weight in the first case. Draw a sketch, and look at it over and over and over again, and don't let that minus sign bite you any more:mad:
 
Thanks for the help.
 
any advice or solution? showthread.php?t=612910
 
Ralph777 said:
This is not an actual problem from my class. All our problems involved an elevator going upward (both accelerating and decelerating). But I am curious if an elevator cable would have the same FT if the elevator was decelerating downward at -3 m/s2 as it would accelerating upward at 3 m/s2 ? I am having a hard time conceptualizing why that is true in my mind's eye.

Homework Equations



Elevator Up: FT - mg = ma Up positive
so: FT = m (a + g)

so I figure that:
@ a<0 FT< FG
@ a=0 FT= FG
@ a>0 FT > 0

I was curious what the values are when the elevator is going down.
I used this equation: mg - FT = ma Down positive
so: FT = m ( g - a )

so I figure that:
@ a<0 FT> FG
@ a=0 FT= FG
@ a>0 FT< FG

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it true that an elevator cable would have the same FT if the elevator was decelerating downward at -3 m/s2 as it would accelerating upward at 3 m/s2 ? I am having a hard time conceptualizing why that is true in my mind's eye.

Thanks

If you want to compare, the convention of positive or negative direction must be consistent.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top