Eliminating x in Lorentz Transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the elimination of x from the Lorentz transformation equations, specifically how to derive the time transformation formula. The user initially attempted to substitute x into the x' equation but made an error in their final expression for t. Another participant corrected this by providing the accurate formula for t, which involves the Lorentz factor (gamma) and the relationship between x' and t'. The derivation shows that t can be expressed as a function of t' and x', incorporating the effects of velocity. The user ultimately expresses gratitude for the clarification and confirms their understanding.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



At the bottom of this page:
http://www.cv.nrao.edu/course/astr534/LorentzTransform.html

It states;
Lorentz factor:
x=y(x'+vt') and x'=y(x−vt)

Eliminating x from this pair of equations yields
t=y(t'+vx'/c^2)
* y =gamma

How did they eliminate x?





The Attempt at a Solution




I'm taking the x value which is y(x'+vt') and substituting this into the x value in the x' equation.

So I'm getting;

x' = y^2(x'+vt')-yvt

Then I've separated the equation so that t is on LHS;

t = [y^2(x' + vt')] / yv

If anyone knows how this is done, I'd be very interested in learning! Thank you. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your last expression is wrong, it should be:

t = \frac{(\gamma^2 - 1)x^\prime + \gamma^2 vt^\prime }{\gamma v}

Now:

\gamma^2 = \frac{1}{1-v^2/c^2}

= \frac{c^2}{c^2 - v^2}

so that:

\gamma^2 - 1 = \frac{c^2}{c^2 - v^2} - \frac{c^2 - v^2}{c^2 - v^2}

= \frac{v^2}{c^2 - v^2} = v^2 \frac{\gamma^2}{c^2}

Therefore, the above expression becomes:

t = \frac{v^2\gamma^2 x^\prime}{\gamma vc^2} + \frac{\gamma^2 vt^\prime}{\gamma v}

= \frac{\gamma v x^\prime}{c^2} + \gamma t^\prime

= \gamma(t^\prime + vx^\prime / c^2)
 
Cheers very much for that.

I understand it now!

Thank you :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top