Elimination Math Problem: Solving x and y Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter nirvana1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elimination
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equation x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1 given x = 2at/(1+t^2) and y = b(1-t^2)/(1+t^2). The initial approach involves squaring both equations and attempting to combine them. Participants suggest simplifying each term and manipulating the numerators since they share a common denominator. Ultimately, the left-hand side simplifies correctly to equal 1, confirming the original equation. The solution emphasizes algebraic manipulation and substitution for clarity.
nirvana1990
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If x=2at/(1+t^2) and y=b(1-t^2)/(1+t^2), show that x^2/a^2+y^2/b^2=1



The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried squaring both equations: xt^2=4a^2t^2/(1+2t^2+t^4)

y^2=b^2(1-2t^2t^4)/(1+2t^2+t^4)

Now I've tried adding x^2 and y^2: 4a^2t^2+b^2(1-2t^2+t^4)/(1+2t^2+t^4)

Am I able to cancel any of this down now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try solving the y equation for t and substituting that t into the x equation.
 
I think you'll find it easier if you add x2/a2 to y2/b2.

Its made fairly easy since the denominators are the same and thus its just a manipulation of the numerator.
 
First simplify each term x^2/a^2 and y^2/b^2.

Then expand the numerator of y^2/b^2. Add it to x^2/a^2, which has the identical denominator.

Can you get the rest?
 
Last edited:
Oh yes thanks! x^2/a^2+y^2/b^2=4t^2+1-2t^2+t^4/1+2t^2+t^4
So the left hand side cancels to give 1.
Thanks again!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top