Elliptic functions, diff eq, why proof on open disc holds for C

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of a differential equation satisfied by the function ##\phi(z)## within an open disc ##D## and the challenge of extending this proof to the entire complex plane. The key concept identified is "analytic extension," which allows results proven for holomorphic functions in a disc to be extended to larger connected open sets. The participants emphasize the necessity of understanding analytic extension to grasp why the proof holds beyond the initial disc. The conversation highlights the importance of this concept in complex analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of holomorphic functions
  • Familiarity with complex analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of open sets in topology
  • Basic principles of differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of "analytic extension" in complex analysis
  • Explore the properties of holomorphic functions in open discs
  • Review the relationship between differential equations and complex functions
  • Investigate the implications of extending results to larger connected open sets
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics, particularly those focusing on complex analysis, differential equations, and the properties of holomorphic functions.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


Hi

I am looking at this derivation of differential equation satisfied by ##\phi(z)##.

diff.png
diff2.png


To start with, I know that such a disc ##D## described in the derivation can always be found because earlier in the lecture notes we proved that their exists an ##inf=min \omega ## for ##\omega \in \Omega/{0} ##Following the derivation through I agree that ##f(z)=0##, however, the trouble I’m having is why having that this proof holds on the disc ##D##, extending it to the entire complex plane?

if a function is constant then its constant everywhere, but because we required convergence and ##|z/\omega|<1## haven't we only shown that this differential equation is satisfied for such a disc?Many thanks

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
see below
 

Attachments

  • diff.png
    diff.png
    43.5 KB · Views: 629
  • diff2.png
    diff2.png
    20.8 KB · Views: 613
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Has the concept of "analytic extension" not been explained in the notes?

Because whenever you prove something for a holomorphic function in an open disc and immediately extend the result to some larger connected open set (such as the entire complex plane), it's analytic extension that is being used.
 
pasmith said:
Has the concept of "analytic extension" not been explained in the notes?

Because whenever you prove something for a holomorphic function in an open disc and immediately extend the result to some larger connected open set (such as the entire complex plane), it's analytic extension that is being used.

Never heard of that term, nope.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K