How to Calculate Satellite Launch Speed for an Elliptical Orbit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter clarabelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the launch speed for a satellite entering an elliptical orbit with an apogee of 5R/2, conservation of energy and angular momentum principles are applied. The initial energy equation combines kinetic and potential energy, while the angular momentum must account for the launch angle of 30 degrees. Several attempts to solve the problem revealed mistakes in the application of these principles, particularly in the use of radii for energy and angular momentum calculations. Correctly equating the energy at launch and apogee leads to the conclusion that the launch speed v0 should be expressed as v0^2 = 5GM/4R. Accurate notation and careful consideration of the parameters are crucial for arriving at the correct solution.
clarabelle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It is required to put a satellite into an orbit with apogee of 5R/2, where R is the radius of the planet. The satellite is to be launched from the surface with a speed vo at 300 to the local vertical. If M is the mass of the planet show that v0=5GM/R (use conservation of energy and angular momentum). Assume that the planet is not rotating and that effects due to the planetary atmosphere can be ignored.

Homework Equations



E= 1/2mv2 +J2/(2mr2)- GMm/r

J=mvr

l/r= 1+ecos(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



i have attempted the question more than once, the following working is the attempt which i thought was closest to the answer.

rearranging the first equation gives

2E/m+2GM/r -J2/(m2r2)=0

at rmax, r=5R/2, dr/dt=0, x=pi

therefore
rmax= -GMm/2E [ 1+ sqrt(1+2EL2/G2m3M2)]

i don't know where to go from here.

2nd attempt:

v=v0sin30 (using launch angle)

therefore E= mv02/4- GMm/r

E= -2.integral[Fdr] + 2GMm/r

therefore
2GM/r= v02/4- GM/r

v02= 12GM/r and r=5R/2

therefore
v02= 24GM/5R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite follow what you're doing exactly, especially your first attempt at a solution. As for the second attempt. The kinetic energy of an object is related to its velocity not a component of its velocity. That said are you sure you listed the value we should get for v0 correctly?. First of all the units don't match, although this is fixed by squaring it. Secondly I get a factor 5/4 instead of 5.

Either way you should make good use of the hint.

Both energy and angular momentum is conserved.
So E(launch)=E(apogee). What is the total energy at the launch, potential and kinetic?
What is the total energy when the satellite reaches apogee?

Same questions for angular momentum, however keep in mind that you have to take the angle into account here. What is the angle between r and p at apogee?
 
That said are you sure you listed the value we should get for v0 correctly?. First of all the units don't match, although this is fixed by squaring it. Secondly I get a factor 5/4 instead of 5.

this is correct, sorry i typed it wrong the question was supposed to say
v02= 5GM/4R.

i've attempted the question as you suggested but my answer is a factor of 2/3 outs maybe you could spot where I've gone wrong as i can't see any mistakes.

E(launch)= 1/2 mv02+ 3mMG/5R

E(apogee)= J2/2mr2 - GMm/r

J(launch)=J(apogee)= mvorsin30= mv0r/2

therefore E(apogee)= mv02/8 -2GMm/5R

equating the two values for E gives

3/8v02= GM/5R

which gives v02=8Gm/15R.
 
The first mistake is:

E(launch)= 1/2 mv0^2+ 3mMG/5R

During launch the distance between the satellite and the center of the planet is not (5/3)R, but is...?

The second mistake comes into life from being a bit sloppy with notation.

E(apogee)= J^2/2mr^2 - GMm/r

This expression is correct, but you are given r at apogee so enter it in the equation right here this will prevent you from making the mistake you're about to make.

J(launch)=J(apogee)= mvorsin30= mv0r/2

Same problem here. You know the r for J(launch) so you can express J(apogee) in terms of that.

The mistake that follows from this is going to this step:

E(apogee)= mv0^2/8 -2GMm/5R

You say that J^2/2mr^2=mv0^2/8, but this is not true. You used J^2=(mv0r/2)^2/(2mr^2). This results in the radii cancelling, but these radii are not the same!

What you should have is: J^2=(mv0 r(launch)/2)^2/(2mr(apogee)^2). Would you have entered the appropriate radii in E(apogee) and J(launch) from the start you wouldn't have made this mistake.

I hope it's clear now, if not just ask again.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, that was really helpful.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top