Complex Representation of Moving EM Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complex representation of electromagnetic waves moving in different directions. The user presents two equations for waves moving in the negative x-axis and the positive x-axis, respectively, and attempts to express them in complex form. There is a question regarding the necessity of including a negative imaginary unit for the wave moving left. The user highlights the benefit of using complex notation, which combines amplitude and phase into a single constant. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately representing wave functions in complex form for clarity and efficiency.
rsaad
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Moving in negative x-axis: E1 = E sin(wt + kx)
Moving in right axis: E2 = Esin(wt-kx-θ) moving to right

write complex representation


The Attempt at a Solution



E1= E Im(exp[i*(wt+kx)])
E2= E Im(exp[i*(wt-kx-θ)])

are these correct or do I have to take into account the -i^ for moving to left in E1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, the advantage of writing the wave function in complex form is that a single complex constant encapsulates both the amplitude and the phase. So you should get equations without a separate constant for phase. See e.g. http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waves/node72.html
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top