EMF between an axis and the surface of long wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electromotive force (Emf) between the axis and surface of a long current-carrying wire. Participants express confusion about the potential difference, questioning whether it arises from the motion of electrons or surface charges. It is clarified that a magnetic field exists at a point within the wire, which influences electron movement, creating an opposing electric field and thus a potential difference. The drift velocity of electrons is debated, with consensus that it can be used for calculations despite initial doubts. Ultimately, calculations yield the same Emf expression, confirming the participants' understanding of the problem.
PumpkinCougar95
New user has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template
A friend mine of gave me a problem :

Calculate the Emf b/w the axis and surface of a long current carrying wire of radius ##r## and current density ##J##.

I am not able to understand why there would be a potential difference between the axis and surface but i think that either of these could happen:

1) Due to the motion of electrons in the wire and the magnetic field an emf is created because of motional emf

using this I get : ## B =\frac {\mu i Vd }{4 \pi} ## Vd is the drift velocity

But I guess this should be wrong as electrons aren't really moving with ## Vd ##

2) Maybe there are some surface charges on the wire?(because of which a potential diff. will be created without any field inside )

I don't know the reason for this but in many problems, i have seen surface charges on wires so I thought that there may be some in this case too.

I am Really confused and don't even know whether the problem is correct or not. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a point p in the wire at a distance r from the axis. Is there a magnetic field B at point p? If so, can you describe the direction of the B field at p?
 
Yes , there is, but what does that have to do with anything ?
in my case 1) I considered that only to find the emf. You have something else in mind?
 
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Yes , there is, but what does that have to do with anything ?
in my case 1) I considered that only to find the emf. You have something else in mind?
What effect would the B field have on the electrons moving in the wire?
 
The B field would try to push the electrons inwards , but since they are moving straight in a wire , an opposite E field must exist. Thereby creating a potential difference.

BUT in order to calculate the emf, we would need the velocity of the electrons. I don't think it would be okay to use the drift velocity as the electrons aren't really moving with that velocity. Am I wrong ?

PumpkinCougar95 said:
1) Due to the motion of electrons in the wire and the magnetic field an emf is created because of motional emf

using this I get : B=μiVd4πB=μiVd4π B =\frac {\mu i Vd }{4 \pi} Vd is the drift velocity

Besides I already did the calculation for the case you are referring to. ^^
 
PumpkinCougar95 said:
The B field would try to push the electrons inwards , but since they are moving straight in a wire , an opposite E field must exist. Thereby creating a potential difference.
Yes. I think that's the idea.

BUT in order to calculate the emf, we would need the velocity of the electrons. I don't think it would be okay to use the drift velocity as the electrons aren't really moving with that velocity. Am I wrong ?
Yes, use the drift velocity. It represents the average velocity of the electrons, which should be what you need.

Besides I already did the calculation for the case you are referring to. ^^
What answer did you get for the potential difference?
 
I get ##Emf = \frac { \mu I (Vd) } {4\pi} ## . Sorry I think in my first post I mistakenly used the symbol B instead.
 
PumpkinCougar95 said:
I get ##Emf = \frac { \mu I (Vd) } {4\pi} ##
I don't agree with your result. Please show your work.

Edit: Actually I do get your result! I had written my answer in a different form (in terms of J and the number density of the carriers rather than in terms of I and the drift speed). Sorry for the confusion.:oops:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top