Empiric Formula of Crom Oxid: CrO

  • Thread starter Thread starter danne89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the empirical formula of chromium oxide based on the given masses of chromium and chromium oxide. The initial calculation shows that chromium constitutes 68.7% and oxygen 31.3% of the compound. The ratio of chromium to oxygen is derived from these percentages, leading to an initial ratio of 1.32:1.96. However, this is identified as incorrect. A further division of the ratios reveals a more accurate ratio of approximately 1:1.5, which simplifies to a 2:3 ratio, indicating that the empirical formula is Cr2O3. The key takeaway emphasizes the importance of further dividing the ratios to achieve the correct empirical formula.
danne89
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
I can't solve this: 1.63 g crom oxid gave 1.12 g crom during analysis. Calculate the empiric forumla of crom oxid.

% Cr = 1.12 : 1.63 * 100 = 68.7 %
% O = 100 - 68.7 = 31.3 %
Cr_xO_y
x:y = 68.7 : Cr : 31.3 : O
= 68.7 : 52 : 31.3 : 16
= 1.32 : 1.96
= 1 : 1
CrO
Which is completely wrong.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hello, try this: 1.32 and 1.96 can be further divided to give 1 and 1.485; this means that approximately 1:1.5 ratio is present. This is the same as 2 to 3, I mean Cr2O3

To sum up, dividing further to obtain a 1 in the series is the most important step here.
 
Ahh! I understand!
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...

Similar threads

Back
Top