I Encircled energy for different aperture shapes (circle, triangle, square)

AI Thread Summary
Different aperture shapes, including circles, triangles, and squares, all measuring 300um in diameter, may produce varying encircled energy due to their distinct diffraction patterns. The area of the aperture is considered significant for the amount of energy transmitted, but the center of gravity (COG) of the diffraction spots shows different behaviors at the edges for each shape. The mathematics of Fresnel diffraction could provide insights, although applying it to various figures may be complex. Additionally, some telescopes have utilized different aperture shapes to achieve unique diffraction patterns that enhance resolution. Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing optical systems.
Gifty01
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Encircled energy
Hi all, I have a system whereby, there are different aperture shapes which are: circle, triangle, square e.t.c. this apertures are all 300um in diameter. I will like to know if the encircled energy calculated for the different apertures after diffraction will be different due to different diffraction pattern. Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think not shapes but area of aperture matters for amount of energy going through.
 
I measured the center of gravity (COG) of the different spot position at different distances on the camera sensor after diffraction. but I noticed different behaviour of the COG calculated for the spots. they behaved differently at the edges.
 
IIRC, one of the planet-finder telescopes used different aperture shapes to get variations in diffraction patterns that resolved 'below limit' separations...
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Back
Top