Solving the Energy Balance Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the energy balance equation for fluids, specifically the terms mCpθ and mCp(θ+dθ/dx θ). The original poster struggles to understand how these terms relate to heat flux in the context of energy balance for incompressible steady flow. While they acknowledge that the final result remains consistent, the method of deriving it raises questions. Another participant expresses a similar discomfort with the approach used in the article. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in heat transfer concepts and the need for clarity in their application.
tonyjk
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
Hello,
I was reading an article, and I found something unfamiliar(sorry I am not into heat transfer a lot) :
Laminar_flow.png


For the energy balance of the fluid, I didn't understand the mCpθ where θ is the temperature and mCp(θ+dθ/dx θ) terms. I know that for a control volume, the energy balance for incompressible steady flow etc.. ΔH = Q = mCpΔθ. I know here we will have the same result at the end but the idea of taking these two terms as heat flux confused me.

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
tonyjk said:
Hello,
I was reading an article, and I found something unfamiliar(sorry I am not into heat transfer a lot) :
Laminar_flow.png


For the energy balance of the fluid, I didn't understand the mCpθ where θ is the temperature and mCp(θ+dθ/dx θ) terms. I know that for a control volume, the energy balance for incompressible steady flow etc.. ΔH = Q = mCpΔθ. I know here we will have the same result at the end but the idea of taking these two terms as heat flux confused me.

Thank you
I can see what they are doing, but I don't like it being done this way either.

Chet
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top