Energy conservation and e = mc^2

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between kinetic energy (KE) and the energy-mass equivalence expressed in E=mc². Kinetic energy is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2 mv², which relates mass and velocity, while E=mc² represents the intrinsic rest energy of a mass, independent of its motion. The constant c in E=mc² refers to the speed of light, not a variable velocity like in the kinetic energy equation. The two equations describe different types of energy, with E=mc² linking mass to energy as a fundamental principle. Understanding this difference is essential for grasping concepts in energy conservation and relativity.
iommi0028
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If Kinetic Energy is mv²/2 how come E=mc² is a valid equation.. wouldn't it have to be divided by two also because c represents a velocity? Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the equation e = mc^2 is a fundamental relation between mass and energy. A particle of mass m has an "intrinsic rest energy" Eo given by Eo = mc^2

im not 100% on the way that they derived k = 1/2 mv^2 but i do know that its only used when relating mass velocity and kinetic energy.

the Eo is the energy a mass has with no relation to velocity or position. the c is a velocity but its a relation to the speed of light your making, in 1/2 mv^2 the velocity your relating there is that of the particle of mass m.

basically the energies in the 2 equations are not the same, and in one your relating the speed of the mass, and in the other your relating a mass to a constant [the speed of light]

hope that helps.
 
the 1/2mv^2 is derived by integrating the force ma over a certain distance:
<br /> \int_{a}^{b}ma dx<br />
 
Last edited:
hey thanks that really cleared things up
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top