Energy conservation equation to find equation for final velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the final velocity equation using energy conservation principles, specifically comparing potential and kinetic energy at different points. The initial equation presented is mgH = mgD + 1/2 mv2f, leading to the final velocity formula Vf = √(2g(H-D)). There is some confusion regarding the notation and the definition of points, with suggestions to clarify the labeling of points to avoid ambiguity. Participants emphasize the importance of using consistent symbols for heights and points to enhance understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clear communication in physics problem-solving.
Racoon5
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Use an energy conservation equation to find an expression for the skier’s speed as she flies off the ramp at point D. There is negligible friction between the skis and the ramp, and you can ignore the air resistance
Relevant Equations
KE = 1/2 mv²
PE = mgh
Energy conservation: E_A = E_D
I initially thought about the different forms of energy present at each of the points:
Total energy at starting point: PEA+ KEA= mgH

at point D:
KE_D = 1/2mv2f PED= mgD
Energy at point D: PED+ KED
D = mgD + 1/2 mv2f

because EA= ED

mgH = mgD = 1/2 mv2f
mg(H-D) = 1/2 mv2f
g(H-D) = 1/2 v2f
so my Vf
came out to be the √2g(H-D)

I have checked this with one of my friends work and he has got a completely different answer to this. This seems logical to me, but I'm new to physics so I would appreciate someone pointing me in the right direction (not providing the solution). Thanks everyone!
Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 1.32.59 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Racoon5
Racoon5 said:
Energy conservation: E_A = E_D
There is not a point A. ##E_H=E_D##?
Racoon5 said:
mgH = mgD = 1/2 mv2f
Presumably you meant mgH = mgD + 1/2 mv2f
Racoon5 said:
came out to be the √2g(H-D)
What you have written means (√2)g(H-D).
To show it correctly you can write √(2g(H-D)) or use LaTeX:
##\sqrt{2g(H-D)}##
 
haruspex said:
There is not a point A. ##E_H=E_D##?

Presumably you meant mgH = mgD + 1/2 mv2f

What you have written means (√2)g(H-D).
To show it correctly you can write √(2g(H-D)) or use LaTeX:
##\sqrt{2g(H-D)}##
Thanks! You have a good point calling it point H. Perhaps I should define the points (A = initial, B = end of ramp, C = on the ground).
 
Racoon5 said:
Thanks! You have a good point calling it point H. Perhaps I should define the points (A = initial, B = end of ramp, C = on the ground).
Yes, that is better than using the same symbol for a point and its height.
If H and D had not been given, I would have used uppercase for the points (A, B say) and lowercase for the heights: a, b.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Racoon5
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top