Energy conservation law problem

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a ball moving inside a ring that accelerates upward, and the goal is to determine the fixed acceleration required for the ball to reach the top of the ring. The key point of contention is the initial position of the ball when the ring begins to accelerate, as it significantly affects the energy dynamics. If the ball starts at R/2, it oscillates without kinetic energy relative to the ring, while starting at the bottom provides it with kinetic energy that converts to potential energy as it rises. The calculations presented suggest that the acceleration should be 3g/4, but there is uncertainty regarding the initial conditions and their impact on the outcome. The discussion highlights the importance of initial position in energy conservation problems involving acceleration.
Petrulis
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a ring which radius is R. A little ball moves inside this ring. Ring's plane is perpendicular to the surface of ground. When a ball is moving inside a ring (ring is in quiet), the ball reaches a height which is equal to R/2.
The ring starts to move upright with a fixed acceleration. What is the value of the fixed ring acceleration, if the ball inside the ring reaches the top of the ring?

(I know the answer of this problem (checked at he book) - acceleration is equal to 4g/5 and a ring moves down with this acceleration)


The Attempt at a Solution



What's not clear from the question is where is the ball when the ring acceleration starts. In my opinion, it makes a big difference.

For example, if the ball is at R/2, it has no kinetic energy w/r/t the ring. Since acclereation of the ring creates a relative gravit of g/5, it would still osccilate within the ring at R/2.

If the ball is at the bottom of the ring, then there is kinetic energy when it starts of m*g*R/2. This will get converted to potential energy at a rate of

m*(g-a)*h, or m*g/5*h.​

Since the translational distance within the frame is 2*R, then

m*g*R/2=m*(g-a)*2*R​

Simplify:

g/2=2*g-2*a​

I get:

a= 3*g/4​

What's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see anything wrong. I agree with your analysis. The position of the ball certainly makes a difference.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top