Energy conservation vs momentum conservation in SHM

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on energy conservation versus momentum conservation in simple harmonic motion (SHM), a problem is presented where a mass M attached to a spring experiences a change when a smaller mass m is added. Momentum conservation is correctly applied, leading to the ratio A1/A2 = (M+m/M)1/2. However, energy conservation fails because the addition of mass m is akin to an inelastic collision, where energy is not conserved due to external forces doing work. The participants clarify that energy is not conserved in this scenario, resolving the confusion around the calculations. The conclusion emphasizes the distinction between momentum and energy conservation in such systems.
nikhilarora
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a mass M , attached to a horizontal spring executes SHM(simple harmonic motion) with amplitude A1 . when the mass M passes through its mean position then a smaller mass m is placed over it and both of them move together with amplitude A2 . the ratio A1/A2 is ...?


Homework Equations


taking angular frequency = ω

The Attempt at a Solution



first taking two mass and spring as the system, since there is no external force momentum remain conserved , applying (M)(ω1)(A1) = (M+m)(ω2)(A2) , i get correct answer but while applying energy conservation equations, i get an incorrect answer!
will energy not remain conserved in such process?

please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nikhilarora,

You might have done something wrong. Show your work.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Hi nikhilarora,

You might have done something wrong. Show your work.

ehild

using k=spring constant
applying momentum conservation :

M*(ω1)*A1 = (m+M)*(ω2)*A2
=>M*(k/M)1/2*A1 = (m+M)*(k/m+M)1/2*A2

=> A1/A2 = (M+m/M)1/2

applying energy conservation :

1/2 * M*(ω1)2 * A12 = 1/2 * (m+M) * (ω2)2 * A22
=> M*(k/M)*A12 = (m+M)*(k/m+M)*A22
=> A12=A22
=> A1=A2

where have i done wrong ??
 
I see. The energy is not conserved when you put the small mass on the vibrating one. It is like an inelastic collision: the masses move together. So the bigger mass has to accelerate up the smaller one, and that happens with the assistance of friction or some other force which does work.

ehild
 
ehild said:
I see. The energy is not conserved when you put the small mass on the vibrating one. It is like an inelastic collision: the masses move together. So the bigger mass has to accelerate up the smaller one, and that happens with the assistance of friction or some other force which does work.

ehild

thanks a lot !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top