Energy Density of a Charged Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the fraction of total energy stored in a charged plastic sphere from the center to half its radius. The initial approach involved using the ratio of energy densities, leading to a conclusion of (1/8)E0. However, it was recognized that the electric field within the sphere varies with radius, which complicates the calculation. The participant acknowledged missing key equations related to the electric field's dependence on radius, impacting their solution's accuracy. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how electric fields behave in charged spheres for accurate energy calculations.
xxacefirexx
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Since this was on the test, I won't be able to type out the question verbatim, but here it goes:

You have a plastic sphere with charge equally distributed through out the sphere. The radius of the sphere is a. The energy stored in the total sphere is E0 (not to be confused with electric field). Find the fraction of the total energy from r=0 to r=a/2 (half the radius).

Homework Equations



energydensity*volume = energy

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply put a ratio of the two energies, so E(small)/E0. Since charge is equally spread throughout the sphere, I figured that the energy densities would cancel out, leaving the volume(small)/volume(big). Dividing out gives (1/8)E0.

However, this seems unreasonably easy, and I think I'm missing something very important. Did I do it correctly, or am I forgetting something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes it does...

so it looks like i assumed that because the charge is constant, that the electric field is constant, which is not the case.

I missed 2 big equations in that, so looks like I am not even going to get that much partial credit :frown:

at least now i can sleep knowing the answer. btw, that's an excellent site.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top