Energy Eigenstates of a Perturbed Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

PChar
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(See attachment)

Homework Equations



x = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m \omega}} ( a + a^{\dagger} )

x = i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m \omega}{2}} ( a^{\dagger} - a )


The Attempt at a Solution



In part a) I was able to construct a separable Hamiltonian for the harmonic oscillators in the x and y direction.

The x Hamiltonian includes the term - \frac{λ x'^{2}}{2}

and the y Hamiltonian includes the term \frac{λ y'^{2}}{2}

Before moving on to part b), at my professor's advice, I collected the squared terms like so:

(for x): \frac{m}{2} ( \omega^{2} - \frac{λ}{m} ) x'^{2}

Calling the term within the brackets α (for y I called it β since there is a + instead of a -)

moving on to part b) I attempted to solve for the energy states by expressing all of the position and momentum operators in terms of the raising and lowering operators.

(for x) after expanding:

H_{x'} = -\frac{\hbar \omega}{4}(a_{x'}^{\dagger 2} - a_{x'}a_{x'}^{\dagger}- a_{x'}^{\dagger}a_{x'} + a_{x'}^{2}) + \frac{\hbar \omega}{4α}(a_{x'}^{2} + a_{x'}a_{x'}^{\dagger} + a_{x'}^{\dagger}a_{x'} + a_{x'}^{\dagger 2})

After simplifying using the commutator between a and a dagger and a few steps of algebra:

H_{x'} = \frac{\hbar \omega}{4α} [ (2n_{x} + 1)(α + 1) + (1 - α)(a_{x'}^{\dagger 2} + a_{x'}^{2})]

I'm pretty sure I can't have those raising and lowering operators in my energy eigenvalues but I can't see any way to eliminate them, I know that in the unperturbed oscillator, the squared terms from the position and momentum operators will cancel, but the alpha and beta are causing problems.

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Quantum problem.png
    Quantum problem.png
    22 KB · Views: 756
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, PChar.

In terms of the primed quantities, doesn't the Hamiltonian have the form of two independent harmonic oscillators? The x'-oscillator will have ω' = √(ω2-λ/m) and the y-oscillator will have ω'' = √(ω2+λ/m). If so, then you should be able to write out the total energy of the system without really doing any more work.

If you do want to introduce raising and lowering operators, I think they would have the form that you gave below for the unprimed variables except ω would be replaced by ω' for the x’-oscillator and ω'' for the y’-oscillator.

PChar said:
x = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m \omega}} ( a + a^{\dagger} )

p = i \sqrt{\frac{\hbar m \omega}{2}} ( a^{\dagger} - a )
 
Ah, figures I would try do it the hard way.

So it seems like my energy eigenvalues will be:

E_{n} = \hbar \omega ' (n_{x} + \frac{1}{2}) + \hbar \omega '' (n_{y} + \frac{1}{2} )

Which should also answer the question about degeneracy, there is none due to the ω' and ω" indicating which component (x and y) of the oscillator is at which energy level.
 
Yes, that looks right. Good.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top