Energy in relation to a forced oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the driving frequencies for a forced oscillator where the mechanical energy is 64% of its maximum value, without assuming weak damping. The equation E∝A²ω² is highlighted, but the problem statement and relevant equations provided are deemed incomplete, making it challenging to formulate a solution. A participant suggests that the relationship between energy and amplitude should be clarified, indicating that E(ω) = 0.64 E_max leads to a different expression than initially presented. The need for intermediate steps in the solution process is emphasized to ensure clarity and correctness. The conversation underscores the importance of thorough problem statements and clear derivations in physics discussions.
shanepitts
Messages
84
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find the driving frequencies at which the mechanical energy of the forced oscillation is 64 % of its maximum value. (Do not assume weak damping.)

Homework Equations


E∝A2ω2, where A is amplitude & ω is the angular frequency.

The Attempt at a Solution


Screenshot_2015-10-09-10-42-20-1.png


Of course this problem is connected to a previous forced oscillator problem, where the values of c,m,k,& Fo are given. Here, I would like to know how to approach this problem and if the currents step I took are correct?

Thanks[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello there,

No responses so far, so let me make a few comments:
Your problem statement is far from complete, so it's hard to guess what you are supposed to do.
Your relevant equations are incomplete too. Previous results (e.g. the ##A(\omega)## expression in the solution attempt seem to come out of the blue.
If ##E\propto A^2\omega^2## then ##E(\omega) = 0.64 \, E_{\rm max} \ \Leftrightarrow\ A\omega = 0.8 (A\omega)_{\rm max}##, and not ##0.64 \, E = A_{\rm max}^2\omega^2## (unless I miss something -- in which case I would like to see intermediate steps...)

Is that a start ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top