Energy loss in terms of beam momentum change

Confused0ne
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
1. Homework Statement

Express the beam energy loss in the accelerator in terms of the change in the beam momentum.

It is taken from one paper, where
\begin{equation}
\Delta T = \left( \frac{1+\gamma}{\gamma}\right) \frac{T_0 \Delta p}{p_0}
\end{equation}expression is used for transition from one equation to the next one.

Even though it does seem legit, I don't seem to find the way to actually show it mathematically.

Please help!

2. Homework Equations

Kinetic Energy:
\begin{equation}
T= mc^2(\gamma -1)
\end{equation}

Momentum:
\begin{equation}
p= \gamma mV
\end{equation}3. The Attempt at a Solution .

\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\Delta T = T - T_0 = mc^2 (\gamma - \gamma_0)=\gamma_0 mc^2 (\gamma/ \gamma_0 -1)= \\
=\frac{T_0}{p_0}(\gamma m V_0 - p_0)=\frac{T_0}{p_0} (\gamma m V_0 - \gamma_0 m V_0)=\\
%=\frac{T_0}{p_0} \left( \frac{1+\gamma}{\gamma}\right) \frac{(\gamma^2 m V_0 - \gamma \gamma_0 m V_0)}{1+\gamma}
\end{split}
\end{equation}

I have attempted different manipulations from here, but didn't get anywhere feasible.
I have also tried the other way around, starting with the right part of the equation

\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\Delta p \left(\frac{\gamma +1}{\gamma} \right)= (p - p_0) \left(\frac{\gamma +1}{\gamma}\right) = \\
=\frac{\gamma^2 m V + \gamma mV -\gamma_0 m V_0 - \gamma \gamma_0 m V_0 }{\gamma}=\\
=\gamma m V +mV - \gamma_0 m V_0/\gamma - \gamma_0 m V_0
\end{split}
\end{equation}

It looks like, I got only one term $\gamma_0 m V_0$, but I am missing something to finalize the other terms.

What AM i Missing?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You can write the last line as ##\gamma_0 m V_0 (\dots )##. I guess it needs some approximation at some point (small ##\Delta p##).
 
mfb said:
You can write the last line as ##\gamma_0 m V_0 (\dots )##. I guess it needs some approximation at some point (small ##\Delta p##).

Thanks for your reply.
Since I need to express \Delta T in \Delta p, I don't see how small \Delta p approximation helps me. As soon as I try something like that (e.g. use p_0 in place of p), it all goes to hell...

γ0mV0(…) doesn't bring me anywhere either...
 
Hmm okay, the velocity makes it messy. What about ##T^2 = p^2 + m^2## (ignoring factors of c)?
 
I finally figured it out!

The key is to apply logarithmic differentiation! \\
1)
\begin{equation}
\frac{dp}{p} = \frac{d\gamma}{\gamma} + \frac{d\beta}{\beta} = \left(\frac{\beta^2}{1-\beta^2} +1\right)\frac{d\beta}{\beta}= \gamma^2 \frac{d\beta}{\beta}
\end{equation}\\
2)
Momentum-energy relation can be written as
\begin{equation}
pc= \beta E
\end{equation}

from here
\begin{equation}
\frac{dE}{E} = \frac{dp}{p} - \frac{d\beta}{\beta} = \frac{dp}{p} - \frac{1}{\gamma^2}\frac{dp}{p}= \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma^2} \right) \frac{dp}{p}
\end{equation}\\
3)
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\frac{dT}{T} = \frac{dE}{mc^2 (\gamma -1)}
=\frac{dE}{E} \frac{E}{mc^2 (\gamma -1)}
= \left( 1-\frac{1}{\gamma^2} \right) \frac{dp}{p} \frac{mc^2\gamma}{mc^2 (\gamma -1)}=\\
= \left(\frac{\gamma^2-1}{\gamma^2} \right)\frac{\gamma}{(\gamma -1)}\frac{dp}{p}
=\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{\gamma} \right) \frac{dp}{p}
\end{split}
\end{equation}
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top