Energy loss of damped oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy loss expression for a damped oscillator, represented by the equation X(t)=A exp(-Beta*t)cos(wt-delta). The user struggles with the complexity of the energy equation E=K+U, which appears messy and challenging to simplify. A key point is the distinction between total energy loss and loss rate, with the latter being easier to calculate as it relates to the velocity squared. In an underdamped regime, the energy loss can be expressed as an exponential decay with minor modulation, simplifying the analysis. Ultimately, the user finds resolution with the help provided in the discussion.
Bill12
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I do not know how to drive an experession for energy loss of damped oscillator.I know that:

X(t)=A exp(-Beta*t)cos(wt-delta)
and:
v=dx/dt...
I found E=K+U
but it seems to be so messy. It is like:

E=(1/2)*m*(A^2)*exp(-2*beta*t)[ beta^2 (cos(wt-delta))^2)+beta*

sin 2(wt-delta)+w^2 ]

I do not know if it is right or not but also I do not know how to get the energy loss from it.

I will thank for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you want loss, or loss rate? Loss rate is easy. dE/dt is proportional to v^2. Integrating results indeed in a complicated expression. But if you are in an underdamped regime (many oscillations before the movement decays away), the expression represents an exponential decay with a small modulation on top of it. If you are not interested in the small modulation, the expression is very simple. You can find it for example by finding 1/2 mv^2 at those times when x goes through zero.
 
Finally solved it.
Thanks for help.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top