Energy loss of damped oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy loss expression for a damped oscillator, represented by the equation X(t)=A exp(-Beta*t)cos(wt-delta). The user struggles with the complexity of the energy equation E=K+U, which appears messy and challenging to simplify. A key point is the distinction between total energy loss and loss rate, with the latter being easier to calculate as it relates to the velocity squared. In an underdamped regime, the energy loss can be expressed as an exponential decay with minor modulation, simplifying the analysis. Ultimately, the user finds resolution with the help provided in the discussion.
Bill12
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I do not know how to drive an experession for energy loss of damped oscillator.I know that:

X(t)=A exp(-Beta*t)cos(wt-delta)
and:
v=dx/dt...
I found E=K+U
but it seems to be so messy. It is like:

E=(1/2)*m*(A^2)*exp(-2*beta*t)[ beta^2 (cos(wt-delta))^2)+beta*

sin 2(wt-delta)+w^2 ]

I do not know if it is right or not but also I do not know how to get the energy loss from it.

I will thank for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you want loss, or loss rate? Loss rate is easy. dE/dt is proportional to v^2. Integrating results indeed in a complicated expression. But if you are in an underdamped regime (many oscillations before the movement decays away), the expression represents an exponential decay with a small modulation on top of it. If you are not interested in the small modulation, the expression is very simple. You can find it for example by finding 1/2 mv^2 at those times when x goes through zero.
 
Finally solved it.
Thanks for help.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top