Energy losses in cables: What is the ohmic loss?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suziii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ohmic losses in two cables with a cross-sectional area of 790 mm², a voltage of 450 kV, and a length of 580 km, carrying a maximum power of 700 MW. The resistivity of the conductor is given as 1.67 microohm cm. A participant attempts to use the formula P(ohmic) = R(cable) x I² but encounters an issue where the calculated ohmic power exceeds the maximum power, which is not expected. There is confusion regarding the current (I) not being provided in the question, and suggestions are made to clarify calculations and formulas used. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations in determining ohmic losses.
Suziii
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
having 2 cables of 790 mm^2 cross sectional area and voltage of 450 kV. the maximum power is 700 MW and the length of cables 580 km. Assuming the resistivity of the conductor is 1.67microohmcm. then what is the ohmic lose?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Suziii! Welcome to PF! :wink:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
Thanks a lot.

I tried to find the ohmic power by the following formula: P(ohmic)=R (cable) x I^2 where R is the resistance and I the current.Then I divided the value for P (ohmic) and for P (max). however the problem is that by doing this I am getting higher value for P (ohmic) than for P (max) which should not be the case.
 
Hi Suziii! :smile:

(have an ohm: Ω and a mu: µ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Suziii said:
I tried to find the ohmic power by the following formula: P(ohmic)=R (cable) x I^2 where R is the resistance and I the current.Then I divided the value for P (ohmic) and for P (max). however the problem is that by doing this I am getting higher value for P (ohmic) than for P (max) which should not be the case.

I don't understand … I isn't given in the question :confused:

(did you use V2R instead of V2/R ?)

anyway, please show your actual calculations in future :wink:
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top