Energy of a car going up a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter anthonyk2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Energy Hill
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the energy required for a car to accelerate uphill, both kinetic and potential energy must be considered. The kinetic energy (KE) is calculated using the formula KE=1/2m(V2^2-V1^2), resulting in 374,922 J for the speed increase from 15 km/h to 75 km/h. Additionally, potential energy (PE) due to the vertical rise of 55 m is calculated using PE=mgh. The total energy required combines both kinetic and potential energy, confirming the need to include the height in the overall energy calculation. Understanding both energy types is essential for accurate results in this scenario.
anthonyk2013
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Not using homework template due to originally being posted in a different forum.
find the energy of a required to accelerate a 1800kg car from 15 km/h to 75km/h an up hill road with a vertical rise of 55m

KE=1/2m(V22-V12)

KE=1/2(1800)(20.832-4.162)

KE=1/2(1800)(433.88-17.30)

KE=1/2(1800)(416.58)

KE=1/2(749844)

KE=374922 J

I'm wondering if I'am on the right track, no sure how to bring the rise into the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anthonyk2013 said:
I'm wondering if I'am on the right track, no sure how to bring the rise into the problem.

+ mgh
 
KE=1/2m(V22-V12)+mgh ?
 
Energy = Kinetic energy + Potential energy

Potential energy = mgh
 
  • Like
Likes anthonyk2013
Thank you
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Power required to drive up a hill
Replies
19
Views
11K
How Long Does It Take a Car to Climb a Hill with Limited Power?
Replies
2
Views
5K
A marble that is rolling without slipping approaches a hill
Replies
5
Views
3K
Starting height of marble rolling around a loop the loop
Replies
12
Views
12K
What velocity does a train need to go up and down the hill
Replies
37
Views
4K
How much work is done by the engine to get the car up the hill?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why Use Kinetic Energy Instead of Momentum to Stop a Car?
Replies
6
Views
2K
KE1 vs KE2, mechanical energy change
Replies
7
Views
2K
Why Does a Car Accelerate When Rolling Down a Hill?
Replies
11
Views
3K
Frictionless puck goes up hill then falls. What's V0?
Replies
10
Views
14K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top