Energy of atoms in different levels

Noirchat
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a set of experiments on a hypothetical one-electron atm, you measure the wavelengths of photons emitted as electrons return to the ground state (n=1), as shown in the energy level diagram. You also observe that it takes 17.50 eV to ionise this atom.

Diagram shows:
n=5 --> n=1 ~ λ = 73.86nm
n=4 --> n=1 ~ λ = 75.63nm
n=3 --> n=1 ~ λ = 79.76nm
n=2 --> n=1 ~ λ = 94.54nm

(i) What is the energy of the atom in each of the levels n=1 to n=5

(ii) If an electron makes a transition from the n=4 to the n=2 level, what wavelength of light would it emit?




Homework Equations



None provided


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt at A

I think i use this equation:
E = -hxR/n^2

where:
h is Planck's constant 6.626 x 10^-34
R is Rydbergs constant 1.097 x 10^7
and n is the energy level


at n=5 i get: -2.907 x 10^-28
at n=4 i get: -4.543 x 10^-28
at n=3 i get: -8.076 x 10^-28
at n=2 i get: -1.817 x 10^-27
at n=1 i get: -7.269 x 10^-27



I think i use balmers equation in part B?

1/λ = R(1/2^2 - 1/4^2) where R= 1.097 x 10^7

1/λ = 2056875


I have a feeling I'm doing this all wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does ionization mean? How does the ionization energy relate to the ground state energy?
 
fzero said:
What does ionization mean? How does the ionization energy relate to the ground state energy?


Isn't it the minimum energy needed to dislodge an electron so it can move between energy states?
 
Noirchat said:
Isn't it the minimum energy needed to dislodge an electron so it can move between energy states?

For ionization, the final state is a free electron: it is no longer one of the bound energy states. This sets a reference point. Each bound state energy can be measured with respect to the lowest energy free state.
 
fzero said:
For ionization, the final state is a free electron: it is no longer one of the bound energy states. This sets a reference point. Each bound state energy can be measured with respect to the lowest energy free state.

Ok, that makes sense to me. So have i used the wrong equation?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top