Energy of Oscillations: Find Work Done Against Tension

anubis01
Messages
149
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A string of length L is clamped at both ends, pulled up a distance h with tension T. What is the energy of the subsequent oscillations after plucking. [Hint, consider the work done against the tension in giving the string its initial deformation]


Homework Equations


E=K+U


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not completely sure if my answer is correct or not, so if anyone can help me check it I would greatly appreciate it. I also just scanned my work because I'm not that great at using the forums latex commands.

http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1155/cci24092009800000i.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That seems to be correct.

In order to use the hint, you first need to figure out what is the force required to hold the string at a (small) displacement y (using small angle approximations). Then, the work is the integral of this force from y=0 to y=h. Doing this, you will get the same answer.

BTW, good job with all those pesky factors of 2. I always screw those up.
 
turin said:
That seems to be correct.

BTW, good job with all those pesky factors of 2. I always screw those up.

yeah those factors of 2 tricked me up for a while too. Thanks for the help, its much appreciated.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top