Energy per second transferred by the resultant wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy transferred per second by progressive waves, specifically when two in-phase waves are superposed. The original poster believes the energy is proportional to the sum of the amplitudes (option A), while the model answer suggests it is proportional to the difference of the amplitudes (option B). The reasoning provided highlights that the resultant displacement is the vector sum of the individual displacements, leading to confusion about the correct answer. Participants emphasize the need for mathematical treatment to clarify the relationship between amplitude and energy transfer. Ultimately, the conversation seeks to resolve whether the model answer is accurate or if the original poster's reasoning holds merit.
desmond iking
Messages
284
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


the energy transferred per second by a progressive waves is directly propotional to the square of its amplitude, if two waves are in phase and superposed, the energy per second transferred by the resulatant wave propotional to A.) the sum of amplitude. B). The diffrenece of the amplitudes.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



my ans is A. since when two waves superposed at a pointy, the resultant displacement is vector sum of individual displacement of two waves. BUT the ans given is B .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So how would you go about proving that you are right?
Maybe a mathematical treatment?
 
Simon Bridge said:
So how would you go about proving that you are right?
Maybe a mathematical treatment?

i am not saying i am right. just based on the reason the resultant displacement is vector sum of individual displacement of two waves. i chose A. so am i correct?
 
Neither A) nor B) seem correct to me. May be I misunderstand the question?
 
desmond iking said:
i am not saying i am right. just based on the reason the resultant displacement is vector sum of individual displacement of two waves. i chose A. so am i correct?
You have said that the model answer says the correct answer is (B) - you did not put that, so you were marked incorrect.
The question only arises if you suspect the model answer is wrong - so you were marked down unfairly.

Therefore, your problem is that you need to find some way to show that the model answer is incorrect, or, failing that, to confirm the model answer is indeed correct.

Your reasoning, how you would go about showing that you are correct, or that they are correct, or whatever, will help us figure out how best to help you.

I'll start you off - you are told that the energy per second of a wave is proportional to the amplitude squared. You write this is as: $$P\propto A^2$$

You are told that two of these waves are in phase - so what is the amplitude of the combined wave?
If the combined wave obeys the same power-amplitude relationship as individual waves, what is the rate of energy transfer for the combined wave?

Please bear in mind that me just telling you if you are correct amounts to telling you the answer - which is against the forum rules.
 
Last edited:
@Dauto: I could make a case either way - the question seems to be from the UK A-level curriculum referring to mechanical traveling waves. Students will have been expected to use their understanding of the coursework to answer the question - which is why it seems a bit incomplete and glib. Either that or we don't have the full text here.

I want to see OPs reasoning before giving away the answer.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top