Energy raising/lowering operators, algebra

raintrek
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
\hat{x} = \left(\frac{\hbar}{2wm}\right)^{1/2}(\hat{a} + \hat{a}^{+})

\hat{p} = -i\left(\frac{\hbar wm}{2}\right)^{1/2}(\hat{a} - \hat{a}^{+})

I'm trying to demonstrate that

\hat{H} = (\hat{a}^{+}\hat{a} + \frac{1}{2})\hbar w

where \hat{H} = \frac{1}{2m} \hat{p}^{2} + \frac{mw^{2}}{2} \hat{x}^{2}

Given the commutation relation:

[\hat{a},\hat{a}^{+}]=1

However I seem to have too many twos! Here's my attempt:

\hat{H} = \left[\frac{1}{2m} \frac{\hbar wm}{2} (-\hat{a}^{2} + \hat{a}\hat{a}^{+} + \hat{a}^{+}\hat{a} - \hat{a}^{+2})\right] + \left[\frac{mw^{2}}{2} \frac{\hbar}{2wm} (\hat{a}^{2} + \hat{a}\hat{a}^{+} + \hat{a}^{+}\hat{a} + \hat{a}^{+2})\right]

\hat{H} = \frac{\hbar w}{4} (1 + 2\hat{a}^{+}\hat{a})

Can anyone point out where I've gone wrong? Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\hat{H} = \left[\frac{1}{2m} \frac{\hbar wm}{2} (-\hat{a}^{2} + \hat{a}\hat{a}^{+} + \hat{a}^{+}\hat{a} - \hat{a}^{+2})\right] + \left[\frac{mw^{2}}{2} \frac{\hbar}{2wm} (\hat{a}^{2} + \hat{a}\hat{a}^{+} + \hat{a}^{+}\hat{a} + \hat{a}^{+2})\right]

is not \hat{H} = \frac{\hbar w}{4} (1 + 2\hat{a}^{+}\hat{a})

but:
\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}(aa^+ + a^+a)

you know that aa^+ - a^+a = 1, how can you manipulate aa^+ + a^+a to become what you are looking for? (\hat{H} = (\hat{a}^{+}\hat{a} + \frac{1}{2})\hbar w
)

HINT: Try adding and substract the same entity, 3 = 3 +1 -1
 
Last edited:
Ha, my own stupid fault. I'd only taken one lot of aa^{+} + a^{+}a from the factorising! Thanks malawi! Been a long day hehe
 
raintrek said:
Ha, my own stupid fault. I'd only taken one lot of aa^{+} + a^{+}a from the factorising! Thanks malawi! Been a long day hehe

I've been there myself 1000times ;) Good luck!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top