Energy required to create electron positon pair

In summary, Jonathan Allday explains in his book "Quarks, Leptons and the Big Bang" that electron-positron pairs are created from the energy stored in the vacuum, known as zero point energy, and return that energy when they disappear. However, the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics suggests that the fluctuations in energy and time can be large but short-lived. This idea of particles being created for a short time is not used in calculations and is considered misleading. In addition, the vacuum is an eigenstate of the number of particles, so the number of particles does not fluctuate.
  • #1
emanaly
33
0
I have read in a book by Jonathan Allday (Quarks, Leptons and
the Big Bang, Institute of Physics Publishing
Bristol and Philadelphia), the following
The positron electron pair which are materialized out of the vacuum are being created by the energy stored in the vacuum(zero point energy) and the energy returned again when the pair disappear.

My Question is :Is his explanation about the energy which creates electron positron pair being provided from the energy stored in the vacuum right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quantum mechanics predicts a (sort of) uncertainy principle between energy and time. (Even though time is technically not an observable.) This means that a system can have quite large fluctuations in total energy, as long as those fluctuations are short-lived.

- Warren
 
  • #3
As time is not an operator, in principle energy can be measured with an arbitrary precision during an arbitrarily short time. The intuitive picture of particles created for a short time owing to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations is never used in actual calculations. In my opinion, such an intuitive picture is completely misleading.

Furthermore, the vacuum is an eigenstate of the operator of the number of particles. Therefore, the number of particles does NOT fluctuate in the vacuum. What fluctuates is the field energy, but electron-positron pairs cannot be created in the true vacuum, not even for a short time.
 
Last edited:

Related to Energy required to create electron positon pair

What is the "Energy required to create electron positon pair"?

The "Energy required to create electron positon pair" refers to the amount of energy needed to create a pair of particles, one electron and one positron, from an initial state of no particles.

What is the significance of the "Energy required to create electron positon pair" in physics?

The "Energy required to create electron positon pair" is significant because it is a fundamental concept in quantum field theory and is used to explain various phenomena, such as pair production in particle accelerators and the creation of matter and antimatter in the early universe.

How is the "Energy required to create electron positon pair" calculated?

The "Energy required to create electron positon pair" can be calculated using the equation E = mc², where E is the energy, m is the mass of the particles, and c is the speed of light. This equation comes from Einstein's famous theory of relativity and shows the equivalence of mass and energy.

What factors affect the "Energy required to create electron positon pair"?

The "Energy required to create electron positon pair" is affected by several factors, including the mass of the particles, the strength of the electromagnetic field, and the energy of the initial state. In general, the larger the mass of the particles and the stronger the electromagnetic field, the more energy is required for pair creation.

Can the "Energy required to create electron positon pair" be observed in experiments?

Yes, the "Energy required to create electron positon pair" has been observed in various experiments, such as particle accelerators and cosmic ray detectors. These experiments provide evidence for the existence of particles and their corresponding antiparticles, as predicted by quantum field theory.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top