Energy stored by a point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy stored in the electric field of a 9μC charge located at the origin, specifically outside a sphere with a 5mm radius. The solution provided uses the formula U=(1/2)CV^2, leading to an energy value of 72.9J, which matches the book's answer. A participant questions why integrating the expression (1/2)εE^2 over the volume does not yield the same result, suggesting a misunderstanding in the integration process. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying the formulas and checking calculations to ensure consistency with established results. Ultimately, the integration approach is affirmed as valid, prompting a review of the numerical calculations.
kayethetutor
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


9uC charge at origin. How much energy does its electric field store outside a sphere centered about the origin with a radius of 5mm?

Homework Equations


C(sphere)=ab/(k(b-a)) V=kq/r U(cap)=(1/2)CV^2 E=kq/(r^2)
a=inner radius b=outer radius

The Attempt at a Solution


let the outer radius -> infinity, then C=a/k. V is 0 at infinity.
U=(1/2)CV^2=(1/2)(a/k)(kr/r)^2=(1/2)aqE= 72.9J which is the answer given in the book
This solution is something I dimly remember seeing but my reasoning is very shaky.
Why doesn't integrating ((1/2)εE^2)4∏r^2dr from r to infinity work? I get integral=-(1/2)ε(kq)^2(4∏/r) which is not at all the same
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
U= [...] = (1/2)aqE
E is the electric field at a radius of a? So ##E=\frac{k q}{ a^2}## and therefore
$$U=\frac{1}{2}aq \frac{k q}{ a^2} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{k q^2}{a}$$
Using ##k=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}## in your equation gives the same formula.
 
kayethetutor said:
1. Why doesn't integrating ((1/2)εE^2)4∏r^2dr from r to infinity work? I get integral=-(1/2)ε(kq)^2(4∏/r) which is not at all the same


It does! Did you run the numbers & not get the advertised answer?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top