Energy Tensor & Field Equation | Einstein Theory

shubham agn
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello!

The Einstein field equation relates the curvature of space-time to the energy tensor of mass-energy. This is fine. These field equations are derived by varying the Hilbert action. Now the Hilbert action is an integral of scalar curvature (R) over volume. So, when we vary this action, we must get the energy tensor of the field. How then do we naively take this to be the energy tensor of mass-energy and claim to have derived the field equation?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Varying the EH action alone, gives you the field equations in the absence of sources. But when you vary the action ##S_{tot}=S_{EH}+S_{m} ## ,where ## S_{m}## is the action for any matter or non-gravitational field, there will be an RHS term resulting from the variation of ##S_m## w.r.t. metric which we define to be the SEM tensor of those fields or particles. This definition of SEM tensor turns out to be compatible with other areas of physics.
 
As Shyan has already stated, one needs to account for the Lagrangian of matter fields while minimizing the Einstein-Hilbert action to obtain a useful equation. The variation of this Lagrangian with respect to the metric is by definition proportional to the stress-energy tensor associated with the matter affecting spacetime:
##T_{μν} = \frac {-2 \delta L}{\delta g^{μν}} + g_{μν} L## (L= lagrangian describing matter fields)
So when we're deriving the EFE, what we're actually doing is setting the action ##S## equal to ## \int ( \frac{R}{2α} + L) \sqrt{-g} d^4 x## and varying the entire integrand with respect to the metric tensor, where ##α## is a constant which is set equal to ##8πG## so that GR reduces to Newtonian gravity ##∇^2 Φ = 4πGρ## when velocities are much lower than ##1## and gravitational curvature is small enough for it to be considered as a perturbation of flat Minkowski space.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top