Energy to Increase Orbital Radius

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total mechanical energy of a satellite transitioning from a circular orbit at radius r1 to a larger radius r2 via an elliptical orbit. Participants highlight the need for relevant equations, particularly those relating to gravitational force and orbital mechanics, such as F = GMm/r². The concept of a Hohmann transfer orbit is suggested as a potential method for solving the problem. There is an emphasis on understanding specific mechanical energy in elliptical orbits and how it relates to position and speed. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on deriving the necessary equations to determine energy changes during the orbital transfer.
omegas
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An Earth (mass M) satellite of mass m is in a circular orbit of radius r1. It is moved to an orbit with a larger radius r2 by way of an intermediate elliptical orbit. This is achieved by firing rockets for a short period when it is in the inner orbit, and then firing the rocket again when it has reached the maximum distance from M. Determine the total mechanical energy for each of the three orbits and the energy increase for each orbit transfer.


Homework Equations


I was not given any equations for this problem or any hints to what equations I need. I had a guess at using
F = GMm/r2


The Attempt at a Solution


I am completely lost on this one. I know I am supposed to equate some equations, but I don't know which ones or how to go about it. I am sure somethings cancel out somewhere. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may want to search for "Hohmann transfer orbit". If you want to derive the energy yourself, you should find some equations in your textbook that relates the specific mechanical energy (also known as orbital energy) with the position and speed of a particle in an elliptical orbit. Alternatively you can search for "elliptic orbit" and see if you can find something related to energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top