Energy tolerance for orbital of electrons

AI Thread Summary
An exact energy level is necessary for an electron to transition between orbitals, with specific energy values required for different transitions, such as 12.09 eV for hydrogen's ground state to the third orbital. The discussion raises questions about the tolerance for photon energy frequency, suggesting that even slight deviations might allow for absorption. It is confirmed that a photon with a slightly higher energy, like 12.15 eV, can excite the electron and subsequently scatter the excess energy as a lower energy photon. The natural width of spectral lines, related to the lifetime of excited states, is influenced by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Overall, while precise energy levels are critical, there is some flexibility in photon absorption and energy scattering.
MikeGomez
Messages
343
Reaction score
16
An exact energy level is required to bring an electron from one orbital to another. For example with hydrogen, for an electron to go from the ground state to the third orbital requires a photon with an energy of 12.09eV. But what is the tolerance? In other words, how close to that frequency does the photon need to be, within 1%, .001%, or what?

Also, is it ever possible for a photon with a slightly different frequency to be absorbed? Can a photon of 12.15eV cause the electron to jump to the third orbital and either …

scatter the remaining energy as a 0.06eV photon?

or

absorb the excess energy as heat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each spectral line has a natural width, a spread in energy inversely proportional to the lifetime of the excited state, and given approximately by the (dare I say it) Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Natural widths are typically very small.

Second question is yes, the photon can excite the atom and scatter as a lower energy photon. No such thing as "heat" for a single atom.
 
Thanks Bill.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top