Energy Transfer: Which Line Transfers Energy Faster?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brocksflyfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Energy transfer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy transfer characteristics of fishing lines with different diameters, specifically focusing on which line detects a fish's strike faster. Participants explore the implications of line thickness on energy transfer, signal propagation, and the mechanics of tension in the context of fishing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks which fishing line, thicker or thinner, transfers energy faster, seeking a simple answer.
  • Another participant clarifies that energy transfer depends on what is being transferred and suggests that a thicker line may transfer energy more easily due to its larger cross-section.
  • Some participants propose that a thicker line would allow for faster detection of a fish's strike due to less elongation when pulled.
  • Others argue that the speed of sound in the line is higher in the cord with the lowest linear density, suggesting that a thinner line may transmit mechanical excitation faster under the same tension.
  • A participant questions the relevance of signal propagation speed, noting that the actual feeling of a fish pulling on the rod may occur later, after sufficient force is applied.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the peak force pulse takes the same time to travel regardless of line thickness, but notes that the maximum force transmitted before breaking differs between the lines.
  • Some participants discuss the elasticity of the lines, suggesting that a fish may need to swim further to stretch a thinner line before the sensitivity threshold is met, potentially affecting detection time.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the input and clarifies their goal of determining which line diameter would allow for faster detection of strikes, indicating that they have heard the smaller diameter may be more effective.
  • There is a recognition that the problem is not formulated specifically, with differing models of tension application being discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effects of line thickness on energy transfer and detection of strikes, with no consensus reached on which line is definitively better for detecting fish strikes faster.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about tension application and the nature of energy transfer, with some participants noting that the problem is not clearly defined. There are also considerations regarding the elasticity of the lines and the conditions under which the fish applies force.

brocksflyfish
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have two fishing lines that are of the same material but one has a larger cross sectional area than the other, which one will transfer energy faster? I am not a physics person so a simple amswer would be appreciated. Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
From one end of the line to the other end
 
The thicker line will transfer energy from one end to the other more easily. If you're transferring energy via heat, the thicker wire will transfer more energy due to the larger cross-section. If you're sending electrical current through the line, the thicker wire will have less resistance.

Hope that helps.
 
I believe it does. That means with the larger fishing line I would detect the fishes strike faster than with the smaller line.
 
brocksflyfish said:
I believe it does. That means with the larger fishing line I would detect the fishes strike faster than with the smaller line.

Actually, I misinterpreted your question. The larger wire will be able to transfer energy easier, but I believe you're looking for which line will transfer the signal of the fish's strike faster. This is a bit more complicated, but I believe you'd also detect the fish's strike faster with a thicker line, because the thicker line would elongate less when it's pulled.
 
That is what I was looking for and thank you for your help.
 
For the same tension in the line, the speed of sound is higher in the cord with lowest linear density. Assuming the same material, the thin line will transmit a mechanical excitation faster. (If the fish applies the same tension...).
 
nasu said:
For the same tension in the line, the speed of sound is higher in the cord with lowest linear density. Assuming the same material, the thin line will transmit a mechanical excitation faster. (If the fish applies the same tension...).

While this is true, when would you actually feel the fish pulling on the rod? Probably not when the first signal reaches the end of the line, but later, after the line pulls with enough force for you to feel it.
 
  • #10
Nessdude14 said:
While this is true, when would you actually feel the fish pulling on the rod? Probably not when the first signal reaches the end of the line, but later, after the line pulls with enough force for you to feel it.

This is quite irrelevant. The sensitivity threshold of the "detector" is the same in both cases.
Whatever force is applied by the fish, it "reaches" the other end slower on the thick cord.
The peak of the force pulse take the same time to travel as the minimum or any other value.
If, for example, the force at the "fish end" increases continuously, from zero to a maximum value (let say 1000 N), the "hand end" will experience the same thing, with some delay given by the travel time along the cord. The delay between the 1N values at the two ends (application and reception) is the same as the delay between the 500N values and so on.
This is of course true for a linear and non dispersive medium approximation.

The difference between the two cords is the maximum force that can be transmitted before the cord breaks.
 
  • #11
You're assuming the fish can apply the same force in an equal amount of time on both strings. However, if you consider the elasticity of the strings, the fish would need to swim further and stretch the small string more before the "sensitivity threshold" is met, compared to a larger string. Compared to this delay, the delay due to the signal propagation speed is insignificant.
 
  • #12
First off let me thank you for your input it is much appreciated. I am a fly fisherman and what I am trying to do is to determine which diameter of line would detect strikes from the fish faster, the smaller or larger. The faster I notice the strike, the more fish I have the opportunity to hook. Given that everything is equal, except the diameters of the lines, I am hearing that the smaller diameter would detect strikes faster. Thanks again
 
  • #13
Nessdude14 said:
You're assuming the fish can apply the same force in an equal amount of time on both strings. However, if you consider the elasticity of the strings, the fish would need to swim further and stretch the small string more before the "sensitivity threshold" is met, compared to a larger string. Compared to this delay, the delay due to the signal propagation speed is insignificant.

The problem is not formulated in a very specific manner. The question was about the energy transfer from one end to the other.
I was thinking about a cord already under tension and applying a very short impulse at the fish end.

Your model is different, I understand. You assume the tension increasing slowly in the string, fish swims away, right?. The distance traveled by the fish until some threshold force is reached will be shorter for the thick cord. The calculations show that the time will be shorter too. I don't know what is the minimum tension that the fisherman can feel. But the time to reach maximum tension can be estimated for typical parameters. It is much longer than the transmission through line, you are right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
734
Replies
4
Views
664
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
854