Energy Uncertainty and expectation value of H

Pikas
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle at time zero has a wave function Psi(x,t=0) = A*[phi_1(x)-i*sin(x)], where phi_1 and phi_2 are orthonormal stationary states for a Schrodinger equation with some potential V(x) and energy eigenvalues E1, E2, respectively.
a) Compute the normalization constant A.
b) Work out Psi(x,t)
c) Compute <H> for Psi(x,t)
d) Compute delta_E, the energy uncertainty

Homework Equations



Delta_E = Sqrt(<E^2>-<E>^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


a) Set: 1 = <Psi(0)|Psi(0)> => A = 1/sqrt(2)
b) From previous: Psi(x,t=0) = 1/sqrt(2)*[phi_1 - i*phi_2]
Use the time evolution equation: Psi(x,t) = 1/sqrt(2)*[phi_1*e^(-i*E1*t/h-bar) - i*phi_2*e^(-i*E2*t/h-bar)]
c) Probability of measuring E1: P1 = |<phi_1|Psi(x,t)>|^2 = 1/2
Similarly, Probability of measuring E2: P2 = 1/2
Then <H> = P1*E1 + P2*E2 = (E1+E2)/2
d) For this one, I attempted to use the mentioned equation. However, I could not find <E^2>.
I thought it would be: (P1*E1)^2 + (P2*E2)^2, but this yields a negative values under the square root, which is not possible since the energy uncertainty is probability not imaginary.
Please help, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pikas said:
a) Set: 1 = <Psi(0)|Psi(0)> => A = 1/sqrt(2)
b) From previous: Psi(x,t=0) = 1/sqrt(2)*[phi_1 - i*phi_2]
Use the time evolution equation: Psi(x,t) = 1/sqrt(2)*[phi_1*e^(-i*E1*t/h-bar) - i*phi_2*e^(-i*E2*t/h-bar)]
c) Probability of measuring E1: P1 = |<phi_1|Psi(x,t)>|^2 = 1/2
Similarly, Probability of measuring E2: P2 = 1/2
Then <H> = P1*E1 + P2*E2 = (E1+E2)/2
That looks fine.

Pikas said:
d) For this one, I attempted to use the mentioned equation. However, I could not find <E^2>.
I thought it would be: (P1*E1)^2 + (P2*E2)^2, but this yields a negative values under the square root, which is not possible since the energy uncertainty is probability not imaginary.
Go back to the definition of ##\langle E^2 \rangle##, and see what you can get.
 
Thank you very much.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top