Engineering PhD - everything should be decent but the GPA

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the viability of applying to top 30 PhD programs in engineering with a GPA of 3.3, despite having strong research experience, good GRE scores, and a solid statement of purpose. Participants share mixed opinions on the importance of GPA versus research experience in admissions. One contributor successfully gained admission to a similar program, suggesting that GPA may not be the sole determining factor. The topic of taking additional subject GRE tests in Chemistry and Physics arises, with some advising against it, arguing that it may not significantly enhance the application and could potentially detract from it. Others suggest focusing on research and relevant coursework instead. The conversation also touches on the competitiveness of engineering PhD programs compared to pure science programs and the potential for fellowships like NSF, with uncertainty expressed regarding eligibility and chances. Overall, the consensus leans toward prioritizing research experience and strategic application choices over additional testing.
safkjldfk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have great research experience, letter writers, GRE scores, and have ideas for a good SOP, but I have a GPA of 3.3 in engineering. Is it still worth it to try to get into decent programs (read: Top 30), or should I just give up and head for the industry? Whenever people talk about GPA vs. research for PhD admissions, I'm getting mixed messages about it, so I want to get a clear answer on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
safkjldfk said:
I have great research experience, letter writers, GRE scores, and have ideas for a good SOP, but I have a GPA of 3.3 in engineering. Is it still worth it to try to get into decent programs (read: Top 30), or should I just give up and head for the industry? Whenever people talk about GPA vs. research for PhD admissions, I'm getting mixed messages about it, so I want to get a clear answer on this.

I got into a top 30 PhD program with similar stats. (slightly better gpa but probably worse gre scores)
 
Physics_UG said:
I got into a top 30 PhD program with similar stats. (slightly better gpa but probably worse gre scores)

Thanks.

I'm planning to take Chemistry and maybe Physics Subject GRE tests as well to see if they can make up for the GPA. No engineering programs seem to require subject GRE tests, but since engineering involves a lot of those things, I thought it might be helpful to take them and show that I know the material despite what the transcripts might say. What do you think?

Also, how much of a shot do I have at fellowships like NSF?
 
safkjldfk said:
Thanks.

I'm planning to take Chemistry and maybe Physics Subject GRE tests as well to see if they can make up for the GPA. No engineering programs seem to require subject GRE tests, but since engineering involves a lot of those things, I thought it might be helpful to take them and show that I know the material despite what the transcripts might say. What do you think?

Also, how much of a shot do I have at fellowships like NSF?

I don't think chemistry and physics gre scores will matter much.

Not sure about the fellowship, to be honest.
 
Also, I believe engineering PhD programs are less competitive than pure science PhD programs.
 
Don't take PGRE, it can only hurt you. I learned that the hard way.
 
Fusiontron said:
Don't take PGRE, it can only hurt you. I learned that the hard way.

If you apply to colleges which require the PGRE and you don't take it, then they just toss your application in the garbage as incomplete.
 
micromass said:
If you apply to colleges which require the PGRE and you don't take it, then they just toss your application in the garbage as incomplete.
He's doing an engineering PHD which only requires the GRE. So again, don't take PGRE. Waste of time, money, and can only hurt your application.
 
Fusiontron said:
He's doing an engineering PHD which only requires the GRE. So again, don't take PGRE. Waste of time, money, and can only hurt your application.

Even if I do well?

My purpose in doing Chemistry and Physics GRE is to supplement my application and hopefully let them know that I'm not as stupid as my GPA might make me seem.

And who knows, I might end up applying to straight up physics programs as well, since there seems to be a lot of overlap with materials science and physics at the grad level.
 
  • #10
safkjldfk said:
Even if I do well?

My purpose in doing Chemistry and Physics GRE is to supplement my application and hopefully let them know that I'm not as stupid as my GPA might make me seem.

And who knows, I might end up applying to straight up physics programs as well, since there seems to be a lot of overlap with materials science and physics at the grad level.

It won't help you. Engineering depts. have so few people the PGRE score (because it's optional) so they have no idea how to account for it. I'm just thinking practically, the PGRE + some extra score reports could mean $ and time better spend on research, classes, etc.

But if you're applying to physics programs as well, then yeah take the PGRE but be warned that it is weighed heavily compared to how engineering schools weigh the GRE.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Get a job and decide what you really want to do, pay of your debts and get your employer to pay for a graduate degree if that's what you decide to do.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
78
Replies
53
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top