Engineering Physics vs. Honors Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between an engineering physics program and an honors physics program at a university, with the goal of becoming an experimental physicist. The engineering physics program requires approximately 45 additional credits and provides electrical engineering knowledge, which could lead to obtaining a P.Eng. degree. In contrast, the honors physics program includes a thesis in the final year, potentially leading to a publication beneficial for graduate school applications. Participants highlight that while engineering physics offers broader engineering knowledge useful for industry roles, the honors program may be more suitable for those focused on experimental physics. Ultimately, the decision hinges on whether the additional year for engineering physics aligns with the individual's career aspirations, as both paths can lead to becoming an experimental physicist. The thread concludes with the original poster indicating they have made their decision and no longer require further input.

Would you recommend engineering physics or honors physics?

  • Do Engineering Physics

    Votes: 6 42.9%
  • Do Honors Physics

    Votes: 8 57.1%

  • Total voters
    14
Voraldo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,I am trying to decide between the engineering physics program and the honors physics program at my university. The engineering physics program at my university is fairly similar to this one: http://www.engphys.ubc.ca/courses.html . The honors physics program is fairly standard. My ultimate goal is to become an experimental physicist in a yet to be determined field. I am indifferent to working in industry or academia.

Engineering physics requires ~45 more credits to graduate but gives me enough electrical engineering knowledge to get a P.Eng in electrical engineering if I so choose.

The honours physics program includes an honours thesis in the final year which could lead to a publication which would be beneficial for grad school.

What do all of you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help out. :)
 
It is all about if you want to spend another year to get the extra options given by eng phys? It contains everything you could expect from a physics bachelor so it won't hold you back in that department.
 
I may be a bit partial, as I'm taking a 5 years engineering physics program in Sweden, including both a 3 years bachelor and a 2 years masters degree. We definitely get a fair bit of both subjects in the first three years - and I'm going to use the masters to go more into theoretical physics, including some PhD courses, so the level is not a problem either.

The UBC courses do seem similar (in names) to ones we have. I'd say that perhaps there is an advantage to knowing some engineering if you want to construct experimental setups, but then again it's hardly impossible for a physicist to learn circuit analysis when the time comes. However, this way you get a little broader engineering knowledge, which would also help you in industry jobs if you don't end up as an experimentalist.
 
To me it seems that the UBC Engineering Physics course is really meant to prepare you more of an engineer than a physicst.

In Europe, Engineering Physics is the revised name for "Technical Physics".
In Technical Physics you study more or less the same physics courses as the other majors but you have to do some applied science lectures (e.g. mechanical engineering).There is one issue here, you can be an experimentalist either way, but if you want to be an experimental physicist I think the Physics honors degree would be more suitable.

You never know, say you don't like the whole applied thing later and found your calling in theoretical physics.

I talked to a few physicsts who started doing research in fields that are new them (experimental), they just learned the very basic during the bachelor, and for their experiments had to learn new things naturally.
 
Thanks for your advice everyone, I've already made my decision now so please stop replying to this thread.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top