Entanglement Swapping Superluminal Communication

burke142
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering whether or why quantum entanglement swapping or steering could or couldn't be used for superluminal communication. Below is a thought experiment. Setting aside the technological barriers do the laws of physics prevent this?

On Earth Base Alpha:

EPR Sources Entangle Numbered Particle Categories into Particle Pairs:

1 & 2 (first)
3 & 4 (then)
2 & 3 (then, finally)

Before particle 3 & 4 entanglement, sensors measure the quantum state of particle 1 and thus determine the anti-correlated quantum states of both particles 1 & 2.

Particle 1 is destroyed or discarded, category 2 particles are grouped into 2 separate containers by their already determined quantum state (e.g., 2A, 2B; where A: up spin, B: down spin, etc.).

Next, particles 3 & 4 entangle.

Then, particles 3 & 4 are sorted into their respective containers and “captured in sequence” in the same order each particle is entangled & received.

Alpha Base: retains the containers of particles: 2 & 3.

A rocket ship transports the particle 4 container to Moon Base Beta.

Alpha Base sensors begin taking “projection measurements” of particles 2 & 3, thus entangling them.

Beta Base sensors take slightly delayed measurements of the individual 4 particles which are the companions to 3 particles (which were just entangled with 2 particles).

With this process, Alpha Base can “steer” the quantum state of category 4 particles.

That is, by entangling particle 3 with 2A particle, particle 4 spins down; or spins up for particle 3 & 2B entanglements. Because of the slight delay, particle 4 measurements alerts Beta Base to Alpha Base’s steered quantum state choice.

Therefore, by modulating particle 3 & 2A and 3 & 2B entanglements, Alpha Base transmits and Beta Base receives superluminal Morse code.

Does this violate relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=612
and the referenced articles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top