Enthelpy, heat of neutralization, calorimetry

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxbashi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calorimetry Heat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final temperature of a mixed solution of HCl and Ba(OH)2 in a calorimetry experiment. The heat of neutralization is given as -56.2 kJ/mol, and the user initially calculated the heat released during the reaction but misapplied the formula for temperature change. The correct calculation involves ensuring the negative sign is accounted for and properly applying the specific heat formula. The final temperature should be 26.3 degrees Celsius, not the incorrectly calculated 121.8 degrees Celsius. The user acknowledges the mistake and seeks clarification on using the calculator correctly.
maxbashi
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A quantity of 2.00x10^2 mL of .862 M HCl is mixed with 2.00x10^2 mL of .431 M Ba(OH)2 in a constant-pressure calorimeter of negligible heat capacity. The initial temperature of the HCl and Ba(OH)2 solutions is the same at 20.48 C.

For the process
H+(aq) + OH-(aq) --> H2O (l)
the heat of neutralization is -56.2 kJ/mol. What is the final temperature of the mixed solution?



Homework Equations


I'm thinking all I need is q=ms delta t


The Attempt at a Solution


q=(heat of neutralization per mol)(number of moles H2O)
q= -56.2 kJ/mol x (200 mL*.862mol/1000mL) = -9.69 kJ

If -9.69 = q = ms(T(f)-T(i))
Then T(f) = q/ms + T(i)
= -9690 J/(400g)(4.184g/J*C) + 20.48*C
= 121.8 degrees C

The answer should be 26.3 degrees C. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to use calculator?

\frac{9690}{400\times4.184} + 20.48

and not

\frac{9690}{400} 4.184 + 20.48

(not to mention fact that you have lost minus sign, in a way luckily for you).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well that's embarrassing. thanks.
 
Happens :devil:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top