Entropy change for non-thermally-isolated system

wumple
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This isn't an actual problem, it's just a question based on my reading. Reif says "If the external parameters of a thermally isolated system are changed quasi-statically by any amount, ΔS = 0."

I don't understand why it has to be thermally isolated. Looking at the entropy relation

dS = dq/T

There isn't any work in there, and the derivation didn't set work = 0. So if a system undergoes a reversible process and dQ is non-zero, it seems that work also has no effect on the entropy change?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wumple said:

Homework Statement


This isn't an actual problem, it's just a question based on my reading. Reif says "If the external parameters of a thermally isolated system are changed quasi-statically by any amount, ΔS = 0."

I don't understand why it has to be thermally isolated. Looking at the entropy relation

dS = dq/T

There isn't any work in there, and the derivation didn't set work = 0. So if a system undergoes a reversible process and dQ is non-zero, it seems that work also has no effect on the entropy change?

We have the system and we have the surroundings. The two together form the "universe".

If the system is thermally isolated from the surroundings, Q = 0 by definition and so is ΔS = Q/T, no matter how T may change during the process. So ΔS = 0 for the system, surroundings and universe.

If on the other hand the system is not thermally isolated, then heat can, for example, get into the system from the surroundings. If the process is reversible though, entropy gained by the system = entropy lost by the surroundings. Entropy change of the universe = 0.

Example: isothermal expansion of an ideal gas. We supply heat to the gas, keeping T constant, allowing it to expand from V1 to V2 and p1 to p2. ΔU = 0 so 1st law reads Q = W = ∫pdV = nRT∫dp/p from p1 to p2 = nRT*ln(p2/p1). So the gas increases entropy by Q/T. This amount obviously is lost by the surroundings. The universe entropy change is Q/T - Q/T = 0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top