Entropy, Enthelpy and Supercooled liquids problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter knowlewj01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Liquids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the entropy difference between solid and supercooled liquid cyclohexane at -20°C, emphasizing that supercooling is an irreversible process. The enthalpy of fusion for supercooled cyclohexane is given as 192 kJ/kg, and participants discuss the limitations of using the integral formula for entropy changes due to its applicability only to reversible processes. There is also clarification on whether to consider the entropy change of the surroundings, which is deemed unnecessary without specific information. The conversation concludes with a note on the applicability of heat capacities, indicating that C_V is not equivalent to C_P for liquids and solids, highlighting the nuances in entropy calculations.
knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the difference in entropy between solid cyclohexane at -20°C and supercooled liquid cyclohexane at -20°C.

Verify that \frac{\Delta H_{ fusion.supercooled}}{T_{fusion.supercooled}} is not equal to the change in entropy.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This is the final part of a question, i have already determined the enthalpy of fusion of supercooled cyclohexane at -20°C \Delta H= 192 kJ/kg

Supercooling a liquid is not a reversable process, ie. once the supercooled liquid is frozen it cannot melt at that same temperature.

so the formula:

\int dS = \int\frac{dQ}{T}

cannot be used because this is for reversable processes only.

for the change in entropy would i have to find a reversable route? maybe the sum of entropy changes from: heating the substance from -20 to melting point, melting the substance, supercooling the substance back to -20.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, that's good, however, in the explanation by Andrew, second post from the bottom.
he uses the argument that the integrals cancel, but the C's arent equal because one is heat capacity of water and the other is of ice, am I right?

Also, if I'm considering just the change in entropy between the two states do i need to consider the change in entropy of the surroundings? I guess i don't because I'm not given any information about them.

Finally, in my notes i have the general equation for change in entropy for a reversale process:

\Delta S = C_V ln\left[\frac{T_2}{T_1}\right] + nRln\left[\frac{V_2}{V_1}\right]

where C_V is heat capacity at constant volume. can i assume that:

C_V \approx C_P for liquids and solids?

thanks
 
knowlewj01 said:
Yeah, that's good, however, in the explanation by Andrew, second post from the bottom.
he uses the argument that the integrals cancel, but the C's arent equal because one is heat capacity of water and the other is of ice, am I right?
You are right. It will not make a material difference though because it increases the entropy change of the 100 g of water, so when you add the change in entropy of the 100g of water to the change in entropy of the surroundings total entropy change is even greater (and still greater than 0).

Also, if I'm considering just the change in entropy between the two states do i need to consider the change in entropy of the surroundings? I guess i don't because I'm not given any information about them.
Correct.

Finally, in my notes i have the general equation for change in entropy for a reversible process:

\Delta S = C_V ln\left[\frac{T_2}{T_1}\right] + nRln\left[\frac{V_2}{V_1}\right]

where C_V is heat capacity at constant volume. can i assume that:

C_V \approx C_P for liquids and solids?
Your formula is correct for ideal gases only. The difference between Cp and Cv for non-gases will depend on the substance. For water the difference is about 1%.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top