Entropy vs Life: Does Nature Use Life to Increase Entropy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aurorasky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Life
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between life and the second law of thermodynamics, questioning whether life contributes to an overall increase in entropy. It is argued that while living organisms can decrease their local entropy as open systems, the total entropy of the universe still increases, primarily due to processes unrelated to life, such as thermalization from stellar bodies. The consensus suggests that life does not significantly enhance entropy compared to natural processes like solar radiation. Clarifications are sought on specific thermodynamic concepts, including thermalization and its implications for entropy calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes that life is not a primary driver of entropy increase in the universe.
aurorasky
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How do life and all processes linked to life go along with the second law of thermodynamics? If living creatures decrease their entropy because they are open systems and in a state of non-equilibrium with the environment, in general does the total entropy increase? (for example, if we have two exactly equal planets, does life evolution bring about a greater increase in entropy?) Is it correct then to conclude that, in some ways, nature uses life to achieve a higher state of entropy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I would not conclude that. Entropy increases with our without life. By consuming the plants formed on planets life is not making a very significant contribution. Most of the entropy in our universe is in dead stars.
 
@ZapperZ: thank you for the very informative articles (I really enjoyed reading them). Could you perhaps clarify some points?

1. If I am getting it right, entropy decreases because of day/night temperature differences and this decrease is much greater than the decrease in entropy due to life evolution, by several orders of magnitude. However, the decrease due to the sun is not related to life at all: it would be present even in Dead-Earth. But this decrease in entropy is what can possibly drive evolution and indeed for this reason the overall rate of entropy increase is positive. So my claim was wrong: if life didn't exist, entropy would be higher (I believed that, organizing themselves, living beings brought about greater increase of entropy in the environment. Maybe life is a statistical byproduct, whenever the conditions are permissive?). Did I understand Bunn's argument correctly?

2. Could you explain these passages:

'In this estimate we did not include any entropy increase due to thermalization of the radiant energy emitted by the Earth. If we assume that this radiation eventually thermalizes with the cosmic background (CMB) radiation in deep space, then an additional, much larger entropy increase results' What is thermalization?

'With these assumptions, we can use the standard thermodynamic result mu/T=- partial S/partial N' I don't know how he came up with this.
 

Similar threads

I Is low entropy found in something very hot?
Replies
26
Views
3K
I How can the maximum entropy and minimum energy principles be physical?
Replies
13
Views
3K
Why does the entropy of a closed system remain constant in a reversible process?
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Is Entropy the inexorable conversion of potential to kinetic energy?
Replies
17
Views
3K
I Physics of paper absorbing Water -- Doesn't this decrease Entropy?
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Does gravity defy the 2nd Law?
Replies
33
Views
3K
Show that entropy is a state function
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
Is the Moon responsible for reducing Earth's entropy and making life possible?
Replies
1
Views
3K
A Equilibrium, entropy, probability - Release of constraints
Replies
2
Views
2K
Trying to understand the entropy of different situations....
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top