EPE and particle collision (grade 12)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance of closest approach between an alpha particle and a proton, considering their initial velocities and charges. The approach involves using conservation of energy and momentum principles, with the need to account for the direction of velocities when calculating momentum. It is clarified that the total momentum must equal zero in the center-of-mass frame, and the particles would be momentarily at rest at their closest approach. There is confusion regarding whether to consider the magnitude or direction of velocity, with confirmation that direction is indeed important for accurate calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying conservation laws in particle collision problems.
krbs
Messages
51
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


An alpha particle moving at 3.0 x 106 m/s [east] (m2 = 6.64 x 10-27 kg and q2 = +3.2 x 10-19 C) is headed directly towards a proton moving at 5.0 x 106 m/s [west] (m1 = 1.67 x 10-27 kg, q1 = 1.6 x 10-19 C). Find the distance of closest approach, assuming that they start from a very far apart position.

Homework Equations


Ek + Ek = EE

The Attempt at a Solution


##0.5(6.64 \times 10^{-27}kg)(3.0 \times 10{^6} m/s)^2\ +\ (0.5)(1.67 \times 10^{-27}kg)(-5.0 \times 10^6m/s)^2\ =\ \frac{(9.0\times10^9)(3.2 \times 10^{-19}C)(1.6\times10^{-19}C)}{r}\\
r\ =\ \frac{(9.0\times10^9)(3.2 \times 10^{-19}C)(1.6\times10^{-19}C)}{0.5(6.64 \times 10^{-27}kg)(3.0 \times 10{^6} m/s)^2\ +\ (0.5)(1.67 \times 10^{-27}kg)(-5.0 \times 10^6m/s)^2}\\
r\ =\ 9.1\times10^{-15}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get that close, they would have to convert their whole kinetic energy in the lab frame to potential energy - they would have to be at rest briefly. Is that possible, or do you see a conservation law that could be violated?
 
  • Like
Likes krbs
I'm lost, but here's my best guess. The only other conservation law I can think of is momentum. I assumed I was not violating this law because it's my understanding that it applies to the instant before and after a collision. If the particles are never at rest, then some of the energy at collision has to be kinetic. To determine the final kinetic energies I'll need their final velocities which I can determine through conservation of momentum.
 
krbs said:

Homework Statement


An alpha particle moving at 3.0 x 106 m/s [east] (m2 = 6.64 x 10-27 kg and q2 = +3.2 x 10-19 C) is headed directly towards a proton moving at 5.0 x 106 m/s [west] (m1 = 1.67 x 10-27 kg, q1 = 1.6 x 10-19 C). Find the distance of closest approach, assuming that they start from a very far apart position.

Homework Equations


Ek + Ek = EE

The Attempt at a Solution


##0.5(6.64 \times 10^{-27}kg)(3.0 \times 10{^6} m/s)^2\ +\ (0.5)(1.67 \times 10^{-27}kg)(-5.0 \times 10^6m/s)^2\ =\ \frac{(9.0\times10^9)(3.2 \times 10^{-19}C)(1.6\times10^{-19}C)}{r}\\
r\ =\ \frac{(9.0\times10^9)(3.2 \times 10^{-19}C)(1.6\times10^{-19}C)}{0.5(6.64 \times 10^{-27}kg)(3.0 \times 10{^6} m/s)^2\ +\ (0.5)(1.67 \times 10^{-27}kg)(-5.0 \times 10^6m/s)^2}\\
r\ =\ 9.1\times10^{-15}##

Such problems are most easily analyzed in the so-called center-of-mass (or center-of-momentum) frame (CM), where the total momentum = 0 initially. If you use non-relatavistic mechanics, then the total momentum in a new (moving) reference frame with velocity ##V## (west) in the initial (lab) frame would be ##m_1 (v_1 - V) + m_2 (v_2 - V)## in the x-direction. Equate that to 0 to find ##V##. (Note that ##v_1 = 3.0 \times 10^6## and ##v_2 = - 5.0 \times 10^6## (all in m/s), so these are velocities, not speeds. Then the initial kinetic energies in the CM frame is ##\frac{1}{2} m_1 (v_1 - V)^2## and ##\frac{1}{2} m_2 (v_2 - V)^2##.

Since the collision is perfectly elastic (assuming negligible radiation due to acceleration of the charges), the total momentum = 0 and the total kinetic + potential energy remains constant at all times in the CM frame. At the closest approach the particles are both stationary in the CM frame
 
  • Like
Likes krbs
Thank you both for your help
 
Yikes. I got access to the solution to this question and now I'm confused for a different reason.

blah.jpg


I'm only supposed to take into account magnitude, not direction of velocity? I thought one of them would be negative, since they're moving in opposite directions.
 
You are correct, krbs. As you say, the direction of the velocity needs to be taken into account when calculating the momentum. So, one of the velocities should be negative. The solution shown in the attachment is incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes krbs
Thanks, thought I was still getting it wrong.
 
Back
Top