Epsilon-Delta Proof of Limit in R2

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChemEng1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Proof
ChemEng1
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Examine the limit behavior on (ℝ2, 2-norm) for f(λ,μ)=\frac{λμ}{|λ|+|μ|} defined on ℝ2\{(0,0)} at (λ,μ)=(0,0).

I think the limit of f(λ,μ) at (0,0) is (0,0). I have tried multiple paths to (0,0) that seem to indicate this. (λ=μ, λ=μ2, et al.)

However, I am lost trying to develop a rigorous ε, δ proof for this. Any help would be appreciated.

Homework Equations


Definition of Limit: Given metric spaces (X,d) and (Y,d') a mapping T:X→Y and a cluster point x0 of X, we say that T has a limit as x approaches x0 and that limit is y0 if given ε>0, there exists δ>0 such that d'(Tx,y0)<ε when 0<d(x,x0)<δ.

The Attempt at a Solution


Step 1. Show that (λ,μ)=(0,0) is a cluster point of ℝ2\{(0,0)}.
Let A={ℝ2\{(0,0)}). Consider sequence {an}={(\frac{1}{n},\frac{1}{n})}. Observe (0,0) is not an element of {an}. Let a=(0,0). d(an,a)=\sqrt{\left(\frac{1}{n}-0\right)^{2}+\left(\frac{1}{n}-0\right)^{2}}\Rightarrow\frac{\sqrt{2}}{n}=0 as n→∞. Therefore (0,0) is a cluster point of A.

(Perhaps a density argument would be more consise way to argue this?)

Step 2. Apply Definition of Limit.
Pick an ε>0. Then for d'(f(λ,μ),y0)<ε→\sqrt{\left(\frac{λμ}{|λ|+|μ|}-f(0,0)\right)^{2}}<ε.

From this I do not know how to pull out the d((λ,μ),(0,0))<δ→\sqrt{(λ-0)^{2}+(μ-0)^{2}}<δ to continue building this proof.

How far off track am I on this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ChemEng1 said:

Homework Statement


Examine the limit behavior on (ℝ2, 2-norm) for f(λ,μ)=\frac{λμ}{|λ|+|μ|} defined on ℝ2\{(0,0)} at (λ,μ)=(0,0).

I think the limit of f(λ,μ) at (0,0) is (0,0)

You mean you think the limit is 0. Try squaring the fraction and work on that.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top