Epsilon-Delta Proofs: Understanding the Process

David_Vancouver
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Why is it, that when ever epsilon-delta proofs are done, once delta is found in terms of epsilon, it is reinputed through again? Is there any point to this really?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is that you make some suggestive calculations to help you find what delta should be. Then you have to go back and make sure it actually works. If you were clever, you could guess delta and then show it works, and skip the finding delta part.
 
But aren't those suggestive calculations definitive? That is, they are always true?
 
It's not necessary to reorganize your proof in a way that makes the delta magically appear from thin air, but it often makes a shorter proof. It's mostly for style reasons.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top