Equation of motion from given 2D Potential

Adoniram
Messages
93
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m moves in two dimensions under the following potential energy
function:
V(##\vec{r}##) = ½ k (x2 + 4y2)

Find the resulting motion, given the initial condition at t=0:
x = a, y = 0, x' = 0, y' = vo

Homework Equations


F = ma = -dV/dr

The Attempt at a Solution


This will obviously involve a 2nd order diff eq, and there are enough initial conditions to solve for the unknown constants. If the potential were given with the r variable instead of x and y, it would be simpler. As such, I'm not sure how to take dV/dr when V is V(x,y) not V(r)...

If I use x = r Cosθ, y = r Sinθ, I can put it as:
V(##\vec{r}##) = (3/2) k r2 Sin2θ

But now that I have θ in the formula, is it ok to take dV/dr as such and set it in F = -dV/dr?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are doing it the wrong way, there are vector involved and ##\frac{d}{d \vec r} = \nabla ## and everyone already says it: force is the gradient of the potential, can you work it out now ?
[Edit: In case I wasn't clear, ##\nabla = \lt \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \gt ## ]
 
*facepalm* Thank you!

##\vec{F}## = -k( x ##\hat{x}## + 4y ##\hat{y}##)

Then set to m##\vec{a}## = m(##\ddot{x}## ##\hat{x}## + ##\ddot{y}## ##\hat{y}##), and compare associated vector components... yes?
 
Just tried that, for anyone who wants to check:

X(t) = a ##\cos##(##\sqrt{k/m} t##)

Y(t) =##\frac{v_{o}}{\sqrt{4k/m}}\sin(\sqrt{4k/m} t)##
 
  • Like
Likes Noctisdark
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top