Equation of relation that has mulitple y points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Learner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Relation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a function F that maps a set of natural numbers X to multiple candidate outputs from sets Y, where each input x corresponds to a unique set of possible outputs. The user seeks the smallest degree function that can accurately represent this relationship, without being limited to polynomial forms. They hypothesize that the existence of multiple candidate y points for each x could allow for a more efficient function than traditional curve fitting methods, which typically focus on a single output. The conversation also references Lagrange's interpolation formula, noting that while n points can be fitted with an (n-1) degree polynomial, the goal is to explore alternative approaches that leverage the redundancy of multiple outputs. The user is open to suggestions for techniques or forums better suited for this inquiry.
Learner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, well I need something close to curve fitting. But I am not sure if it could serve the purpose. The problem is as below:
Suppose, I have the following relation X r Y. Here X is a natural number set. Suppose we have "k" sets,D1,D2,..Dk of selected datapoints over natural number, such that the intersection of all Di's is null set. Let Y be a set of all Di's.

The relation relates every x, to a set of possible data point sets in Y.

As an example see this, here we have k=3.

X Y
1 {2, 4, 5, 10, 12, 13 }
2 { 3,7,8,9,11,14}
3 {1,6, 15,17, 20, 22}
4 {2, 4, 5, 10, 12, 13 }
5 { 3,7,8,9,11,14}

The question is to find the Smallest equation/function F that Exactly fits the given data in such a way that F(x) just outputs anyone of the datapoint from the Di. I do not need the whole Di.Just anyone of the value from Di.

As an example, the F may be

X Y
1 2
2 3
3 1
4 2
5 3

I need to find the relation F :)




Well, I am looking for the smallest degree function. There is no restriction that it should be polynomial even.( May be aCos(x)+bSin(x) etc. ). What I am looking for is a technique that can take advantage of the fact that it has multiple candidate y points for each x. Many traditional curve fitting techniques tend to fit the curve around one y point.

My hypothesis is that since we have multiple candidate y points for each x, one can exploit this redundancy, and might be able to get a function much smaller than (n-1) polynomial. How true is this ?


If you know that I have chosen the wrong forum, please point me to the right place. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, I am looking for the smallest degree function. There is no restriction that it should be polynomial even.( May be aCos(x)+bSin(x) etc. ). What I am looking for is a technique that can take advantage of the fact that it has multiple candidate y points for each x. Many traditional curve fitting techniques tend to fit the curve around one y point.

My hypothesis is that since we have multiple candidate y points for each x, one can exploit this redundancy, and might be able to get a function much smaller than (n-1) polynomial. How true is this?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top