Equation of state for electron degenerate matter

AI Thread Summary
In the study of white dwarfs, the transition from a non-relativistic to a relativistic equation of state occurs due to the increase in central density, which causes electrons to become relativistic. This phenomenon is explained by degeneracy pressure, where confining electrons in a small space requires them to have high momentum, as dictated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. As density increases, electrons must occupy smaller deBroglie wavelengths, leading to larger expected momentum and, consequently, higher kinetic energy and pressure. The relationship between pressure and kinetic energy density differs in relativistic and non-relativistic cases, with relativistic pressure being one-third of the kinetic energy density. Understanding these principles is crucial for comprehending the behavior of electron degenerate matter in high-density environments.
aleazk
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
83
Reaction score
62
Hi, this may be a silly question. In the study of white dwarfs, why we change from the non-relativistic equation of state, P(ρ)=K.ρ^(5/3), to the relativistic case, P(ρ)=K'.ρ^(4/3), when there is an increase in the central density of the star, i.e., why the electrons, which compose the Fermi gas, become relativistic in the high density regime?. Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's not a silly question, it's a question that would have seemed unthinkably bizarre to anyone before the year 1920. But it all has to do with the surprising fact that to contain an electron into a small space requires that the electron have a lot of momentum. This is the heart of the concept of "degeneracy pressure", which is what you are talking about.

Now, at first glance it seems completely crazy that the electron should have a lot of momentum if it is contained in a small space (by high density)-- shouldn't being highly localized be the opposite of having lots of momentum? Not according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which says that momentum and position are complementary so to know the second to high precision requires that the first might be very high, and not according to the deBroglie wavelength, which says that to confine an electron in a small space requires a short deBroglie wavelength, which in turn requires a large momentum (the deBroglie wavelength is deeply connected with the uncertainty principle).

Now, mind you the momentum can't have a particular direction, because to be tightly confined the particle can't shoot off in some direction. So we are really talking about the magnitude of the momentum, or the momentum squared, which are the two ways of talking about kinetic energy (the first for highly relativistic particles, the second for nonrelativistic particles, and that's the difference you refer to above).

So we have that, if the density is high, then indistinguishable Fermions that are not allowed to occupy the same state must be highly confined, meaning that they must have very small deBroglie wavelengths (which scale inversely to the cube root of the density, that's the interparticle spacing), meaning that they must have proportionately large expected momentum, meaning that they must have large kinetic energy, meaning that they must exert high pressure. How you make the connection is different for relativistic or non-relativistic-- if relativistic, the pressure is 1/3 the kinetic energy density, and if nonrelativistic, the pressure is 2/3 the kinetic energy density. Also, if relativistic, the kinetic energy density scales with the density times the momentum per particle, and if nonrelativistic, the kinetic energy density scales with the density times the square of the momentum per particle. That's it, that's all you need, to get the dependences you cited above.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top