Equation of Virtual Work VS Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The virtual work equation for linear elastic materials resembles the potential energy equation, differing primarily by a (1/2) coefficient in the internal work term of the potential energy equation. This discrepancy arises from the distinct methods of load application in virtual work compared to potential energy calculations. The discussion seeks clarification on the origin of the (1/2) coefficient in the potential energy equation. Participants express confusion regarding the explanation of this coefficient. Understanding the relationship between load application and energy calculations is essential for grasping these concepts.
rdbateman
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
For linear elastic materials (3D General)...

The virtual work equation looks exactly like the equation for potential energy except that in the potential energy equation, the internal work term has a (1/2) coefficient. Why are these different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know why the potential energy has a 1/2 coefficient?

It has to do with the method of application of the loads, which is different for VW.
 
That doesn't answer the question.
 
Actually I did provide an answer, albeit very short.

But I still don't know if you understand where the 1/2 comes from.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
Question about potential energy: gravity and a vertical spring
Replies
12
Views
4K
I Work-Energy Theorem for Moving Block and Spring System?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Meaning of potential energy in external fields
Replies
19
Views
2K
Potential Energy and Potential -- Systems versus Particles
Replies
6
Views
11K
Regarding the idea of potential energy
Replies
2
Views
1K
"External" potential energies strike back
Replies
6
Views
1K
B The work done by two objects on each other
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Physical interpretation of the "total potential energy"
Replies
20
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top