A Equation with three consecutive prime numbers

Dacu
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
Solve the equation np_n+(n+1)p_{n+1}+(n+2)p_{n+2}=p^2_{n+2} where n\in \mathbb N^* and p_n , p_{n+1} , p_{n+2} are three consecutive prime numbers.
-------------------------------------
A solution is n=2,p_2=3,p_3=5,p_4=7.
May be other solutions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you know that there can't be a solution with n \geq 10. So there are only 10 possibilities to check.

Here's my reasoning:
n p_n + (n+1) p_{n+1} + (n+2) p_{n+2} \leq 3 (n+2) p_{n+2}

So if n p_n + (n+1) p_{n+1} + (n+2) p_{n+2} = p_{n+2}^2, that means

3 (n+2) p_{n+2} \geq p_{n+2}^2

which means

3 (n+2) \geq p_{n+2}

I'm pretty sure that for n \geq 10,
3(n+2) \lt p_{n+2}

(When n=10, 3(n+2) = 36 and p_{n+2} = 37)
 
My reasoning:
From the original equation we get (n+2)^2+4np_n+4(n+1)p_{n+1}=m^2 where m\in \mathbb N^*.
Is there such a natural number m?
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top