Equations of Motion (Deriving equations)

AI Thread Summary
To derive the equation for velocity as a function of acceleration and time, start with the definition of acceleration as the change in velocity over time, a(t) = dv(t)/dt. Integrate both sides from the initial time t0 to time t, resulting in v(t) - v0 = ∫a(t) dt. This integral provides a relationship between velocity and acceleration, but it needs to be expressed as v = f(a, t). To achieve this, an assumption about the nature of acceleration is necessary, which can transform the integral into a function of acceleration and time. The final equation is v = v0 + a(t2 - t1).
arjun90
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am just wondering how you would approach this problem:
Using the definitions below, derive an equation for velocity as a function of acceleration and time (v=f(a,t)). Assume initial velocity is Vo. The answer to this problem is v=v0+a(t2-t1). My question is how would you arrive to this answer step-by-step. Below are the definitions:

x=current position in the x dimension
deltax= change in position
t=time now, t0 is the starting time.
deltat= a time interval, t2-t1.
v=deltax/deltat (use as a scaler for now).
deltav= a change in velocity.
a=deltav/deltat (Use as a scaler for now).

Subscripts: 0 is an initial value, other numbers are subsequent values in time order as needed.

v (average)= (v1+v2)/2, a simple average.

Any help will be appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
# I would first look at the definitaion of a
a(t) = \frac{dv(t)}{dt}
# Integrate both sides
\int^{t}_{t_0} a(t) dt = v(t) - v(0)
# This is the relation between v and a. but it is not in the form of you want, i.e. v=f(a,t). It is an integral equation.
# So, there should be an assumption about a, which changes integral the relation between a and v to a function. I think if you think, you can find it by yourself.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top