Equilibrium and c is because ice cube is water so it will melt

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying which systems are in equilibrium among four scenarios. The user initially believes that all systems (a, b, c, d) reach equilibrium due to being stoppered, allowing no vapor escape. However, they reconsider system c, recognizing that the temperature difference between ice and room temperature affects the equilibrium state. The melting of the ice cube introduces a dynamic change, leading to the conclusion that not all systems are in equilibrium. The conversation highlights the importance of temperature in determining equilibrium in physical systems.
aarietta
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello there,
I am unsure about the following question and would like some help to understand please! :smile:

Consider the following systems:
a) a container that is half filled with alcohol, stoppered and allowed to stand for several days
b) crystals of KMnO4 that are dissolved in water until the water becomes a uniform purple colour and a constant amount of crystal remainds in the container
c) an ice cube in a beaker of water in a normal classroom
d) moth balls that are placed in an empty flash that is then stoppered and alllowed to stand for several days

Which of the above are in an equilibrium state?
i) a and b
ii) a,b,d
iii) b,c
iv) a,b,c,d



At this moment, I am picking IV because A and D are stoppered in the flask so it would eventually reach equilibrium since no vapour is allowed to escape. As for B, when the crystals mix in with water it causes stress to the equilibrium but then it would eventually fix itself back to equilibrium and c is because ice cube is water so it will melt into water, which causes no change to the equilibrium.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may wish to re consider system c. What is the temperature of ice? What is average room temperature?
 
Ohh... I see!
Thank you
 
aarietta said:
Ohh... I see!
Thank you
No problem :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top