The discussion centers on the concept of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) and the significance of the term 'equilibrium' in this context. Participants explore its relevance in understanding climate dynamics, particularly in relation to energy imbalances caused by increased CO2 levels. The scope includes theoretical implications and applications in various fields.
Participants express differing views on the relevance and implications of the term 'equilibrium' in ECS. There is no consensus on the necessity of the term or its implications for understanding climate sensitivity.
Some participants express uncertainty about the clarity of the initial question, suggesting it may be vague or lacking in focus. The discussion also highlights the complexity of climate systems and the time scales involved in reaching equilibrium.
The emphasis is the equilibrium or balanced state and the sensitivity of the system to a departure from equilibrium. Much of applied science, e.g., process engineering such as power generation, operation of aircraft or spacecraft , chemical manufacturing, is concerned about control and how the system responds to deviations or perturbations from steady-state. In health care, doctors would be concerned if one's temperature deviated more than a few degrees F, e.g., having a temperature of 104°F as compared to 97.4 to 99°F, means one has a fever. If the temperature drops much lower (body temperature falls below 95 F (35 C)), one is experiencing hypothermia.Gondur said:Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity - what is the relevance of the word 'equilibrium' - why not 'climate sensitivity?'
Hope you can help.
At the very center of the theory of AGW, is the idea that doubling the CO2 level would create an energy imbalanceGondur said:Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity - what is the relevance of the word 'equilibrium' - why not 'climate sensitivity?'
Hope you can help.